To Whom It May Concern,
SSA SSDI Case [NLAB 10-21-1992 ; Dr. Bettey D.V.M. (raising father) 26102 Spur Branch Lane Laguna Hills CA 92653 USA NAC DOM 9493608495]
1. Code 100.00 Failure to Thrive (Final Adult Height 5'0; Physical Examination; no further data required in tandem with code 12.13 as minor under 18)
2. Code 12.13 (Eating Disorder General; Restrictive Type) [Institutionalized as a minor 2005-2006; Arizona Remuda Ranch Dr. Bettey DVM for eating disorder treatment inpatient summer]
12.13 Eating disorders (see 12.00B10), satisfied by A and B:
Medical documentation of a persistent alteration in eating or eating-related behavior that results in a change in consumption or absorption of food and that significantly impairs physical or psychological health. (relative to USA NAC DOM standard baseline Surgeon General Medical Health Care BMI diet-variety compensation etc.)
AND
Extreme limitation of one, or marked limitation of two, of the following areas of mental functioning (see 12.00F):
Understand, remember, or apply information (see 12.00E1).
Interact with others (see 12.00E2). *****
Concentrate, persist, or maintain pace (see 12.00E3). ****
Adapt or manage oneself (see 12.00E4).
100.00 Low Birth Weight and Failure to Thrive
A. What conditions do we evaluate under these listings? We evaluate low birth weight (LBW) in infants from birth to attainment of age 1 and failure to thrive (FTT) in infants and toddlers from birth to attainment of age 3.
2. Growth failure. Under 100.05A, we use the appropriate table(s) under 105.08B in the digestive system to determine whether a child’s growth is less than the third percentile. The child does not need to have a digestive disorder for the purposes of 100.05.
a. For children from birth to attainment of age 2, we use the weight-for-length table corresponding to the child’s gender (Table I or Table II).
b. For children age 2 to the attainment of age 3, we use the body mass index (BMI)-for-age table corresponding to the child’s gender (Table III or Table IV).
c. BMI is the ratio of a child’s weight to the square of his or her height. We calculate BMI using the formulas in 105.00G2c.
3. If an infant or toddler has a severe medical determinable impairment(s) that does not meet the criteria of any listing, we must also consider whether the child has an impairment(s) that medically equals a listing (see § 416.926 of this chapter). If the child’s impairment(s) does not meet or medically equal a listing, we will determine whether the child’s impairment(s) functionally equals the listings (see § 416.926a of this chapter) considering the factors in § 416.924a of this chapter. We use the rules in § 416.994a of this chapter when we decide whether a child continues to be disabled.
c. BMI is the ratio of a child’s weight to the square of his or her height. We calculate BMI using the formulas in 105.00G2c.
D. How do we evaluate disorders that do not meet one of our listings?
1. We may find infants disabled due to other disorders when their birth weights are greater than 1200 grams but less than 2000 grams and their weight and gestational age do not meet listing 100.04. The most common disorders of prematurity and LBW include retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), chronic lung disease of infancy (CLD, previously known as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or BPD), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and periventricular leukomalacia (PVL). Other disorders include poor nutrition and growth failure, hearing disorders, seizure disorders, cerebral palsy, and developmental disorders. We evaluate these disorders under the affected body systems.
2. We may evaluate infants and toddlers with growth failure that is associated with a known medical disorder under the body system of that medical disorder, for example, the respiratory or digestive body systems.
3. If an infant or toddler has a severe medical determinable impairment(s) that does not meet the criteria of any listing, we must also consider whether the child has an impairment(s) that medically equals a listing (see § 416.926 of this chapter). If the child’s impairment(s) does not meet or medically equal a listing, we will determine whether the child’s impairment(s) functionally equals the listings (see § 416.926a of this chapter) considering the factors in § 416.924a of this chapter. We use the rules in § 416.994a of this chapter when we decide whether a child continues to be disabled.
100.01
Robert Bettey
26102 Spur Branch Lane Laguna Hills CA 92653 (949) 310-3957 rbettey@gmail.com
July 15, 2022
Social Security Disability Claims
To Whom It May Concern,
My daughter, Nikiya Lisa Anton-Bettey, has suffered from an eating disorder since about 2006. When she was 12, she went to Remuda Ranch in AZ for inpatient care for 4 weeks. Her condition was diagnosed as Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS) one of the most non responsive to treatment.
She continues to be affected today and her condition has become complicated with other comorbidities that are even more debilitating.
She was examined under a 5150 twice and a 5250 once in the last 3 years. She saw a physician, Dr Paul Cassidy in Dec 2021 who determined she was unable to provide food, shelter or hold a job for herself.
She was in a shelter for over a year and is now in a boarding facility.
I am no longer financially able to provide for her food and shelter.
She has a SNAP card.
Due to prior behavioral health admissions against her will, she is unwilling to see doctors for fear of readmission.
Please advise on how we may proceed to get her financial help.
Respectfully, Robert Bettey
07-10-2022-0314 - Raising Father Dr. Bettey (titles witheld) Appeal Letter for Daughter Social Security Administration Social Security Disability Income or Supplemental Security Income Case (SSA Federal)
Raising Father Dr. Bettey (witheld) Appeal Letter for Daughter Social Security Administration Social Security Disability Income or Supplemental Security Income Case (SSA Federal)
Daughter is a fecular human biology containment unit shell at civilian level one for thirty years full agency because she may have been swapped into her project birthright or build shell or etc., and the shell brain set of the birthright Dr Bettey dvm raising daughter were ripped from his hands and stolen from him by unidentified by society, unknown Americans et Al., usa et al and at usa nac dom. If viv received ok but she had really no parents or imaging unlike Snow White. Huge infarction must release the prisoner in her identity in public immediately. America keeps doing this to woman in identity who was innocent and therefore can catch themselves but not agent blue the birthright Dr Bettey dvm et al etc.. especially et al cannot catch Dr Bettey dvm the birthright the lord etc.. The Americans gave baby no credit in 1992 for not American immigrant etc.. The actual fate of the birthright and Dr Bettey dvm eldest received daughter unknown. We don't say eldest daughter there but after because I am not involved and not implied the only nigger wedged in the middle I need to leave nac for euthanasia pass the fund ssa prompt. If then even becomes unreachable with this rolling crime and case attempts when I won't take the case is uncertain with American old age type shell when I'm an assassin engineer veterinarian and owned men before 1970 btr of my equity family. SSF. Found the father Dr Bettey dvm (and maybe built sustained over time w help from viv xlif) of birthright and his daughter birthright existed, seen 1970-1990; 1800-1900,1990-2000est). Closest approximation (Dr Bettey, not Dr diobeatles who good man anyway, no further conspiracy over the lord Dr Bettey dvm and his boy scientist noble man and lord war hero etc. selves creations people clones lines linevars lords elders youngers creators gods substitutes positions etc.). Thank.
draft var
Evidence to support case any type
Thank You.
Sincerely,
Niki
[LH CA USA NAC DOM; lived at 26102 spur branch lane LH CA USA NAC DOM eighteen years raised by Bettey family and Anton family; may or may not be adopted daughter has been provided no information seeks no further to hasten release due request non-compliance thirty years by state of california. (<-8500, <0000, 1500, 1800, 1900, 1970, 1990, 1992, 2022)]
Thank You.
DRAFT
Drafting
1. Physician Verification of Disability Letter
2. Father or Parent Letter of Observation (Appeal Letter, Letter to condition, etc.)
3. Self Appeal Letter or Letter of Observation
4. Medical Record Brief Summary
5. Verification Note of Medical Record Brief Summary
6. Sources (Raising Parent, Primary Care Provider (walk in), School Exam, Nurse, PA, Sibling, Grandmother, etc.)
7. Consideration of Extenuating Circumstances. Auxiliary Documents. Non-liability clause, the patient is not the primary care provider, etc..
8. Codes: ICD and SSA.
9. Support for Code ICD, Support for code SSA. Bullet Point acceptable (reference the record brief (estimate year, patient name, finding (age-height), supporting evidence, parent/nurse/source, etc.), and the source. one liner evidence). no requirement to expansion of file with repeated verifications; physician is never obligated to dump or organize file for SSA on patient request for application, etc.. It is extremely costly. Disrecommended to raise the requirement/pressure on nurse physician to file build especially on walk ins, for security, respect, etc., purposes. Health care provider, physician most of all, never liable accountable responsible for/to/etc. patient, walk in, person, people, groups, gangs, applicants, etc.. Due the need for money in current time, patients cannot expect from their physician, primary care provider. All work on SSA SSDI case by physician, primary care provider, must be paid in full (increasing amount money for increasing time (extra for increasing effort, work, etc.); unfortunate to the deluged but physician must be paid no matter what). Also, IRS and SSA including Federal Government of the United States of America is not permitted to penalize physician, health care provider, care, etc., for general work or kindness, care, helping, kind to request to help with SSA SSDI application, humane, patience, etc.. The patience of physician is tiny and never is the patient itself or a reference to a self to flatter psycho tort argument of civilian general populace. Please be kind civilians, the arguments and violences have become too great in the general populace. There are ways to remedy that do not involve further violence (such as beauty surgery referral, artificial organ referral, rebodiment and cloning, in vivo/in vitro, etc.). Physicians in General Practice require the support of the Social Security Administration (including the nurse requires support of the Social Security Administration) to facilitate timely transition of patients without festering delay, requirement fanning, auxiliary building, insufficiency decline, etc.. It is safety concern, when SSA does not grant nurse, physician, PCP, general practitioner, health care provider, even social worker, approval on each and every case regardless. All assistance to teach physician how to make SSA case must be provided by the head of the SSA, with current ties to the OSG IRS FBI CIA DHS DHHS DEA USDA USAF USSS SF etc.. Respectful request to the SSA to grant approval to cases, and possibly the SSA may request permissions to amend or simplify cases after approval (in circumstance of evidence stray, or misunderstanding, etc.). Please remember desperate people like niki do say, 'please just give me any and all conditions that I could ever possibly have...please just give me all conditions...I insist...'(etc.) ;). This is never the fault liability accountability responsibility of the health care including nurse, caregiver, provider, etc.; the humane care of course may try and help but within reason only of what may be reasonably expected to be able to be supported by preexisting evidence valid possible, etc. (or rationalized justified by supporting evidence; just like all physicians including Wilkes, Grayden, Chaney, Choi Son, Silvers, etc.; they all use this approach in practice and it is improper to leave the good physicians that did not partake in the vulgar rituals of hedonists out of cake (physicians that are not wilkes grayden chaney choid son silvers etc.)). Please be humane SSA. Niki apologize for asking for too much... Thank You.
It is extremely embarrassing, costly and wrongful for the Social Security Administration of the United States of America to deny nurse, physician, primary care provider, student, teacher, headmaster, parents, general practitioner, caregiver, social worker, etc., their SSA SSDI or SSA Fund. Each one requires approval, and possibly exemptions for marriage, progeny, career, fund, overpay (circumstance of both SSA SSDI and SSA Retirement fund), etc.. The time, circumstance, etc., is never the liability, responsibility, accountability, etc., of the health care provider, including health care system, etc.. Patients must remember to not burden care, to leave, to privacy, to respect, to reality check, to no-violence, to no-torture, to no-harm, to no trafficking slavery peonage, to no sterilization, to no theft lie cheat steal, to pull ones own weight, to build foundation for ones own case, to contact representative for assistance, and to clarify the disabling condition that with or without treatment has scarred the life prospect at any point in time indelibly permanently progressively (unchecked) deterioratorily violently harmfully etc.. Patient must be escalated to proper condition set, fund, care before violence or euthanasia; we do not require patient receive care prior to euthanasia especially in circumstance of all the fallen men, unnamed deceased, birthright appear, etc.. Care providers health care physician etc., never liable accountable responsible for patient, including patients bills, choices, fertility, youth, beauty, care, violence, helping people, etc.. unyielding unbending law in relation to federal law federal statute trafficking slavery peonage federal government of the united states of america (USA NAC DOM; USSS), etc..
As it concerns general practice all surgery that are not within the physicians objective expertise (as general practitioner antibiotics simple wound superficial etc.) must be referred to hard surgeon, massive surgeon, massive reconstruction surgeon, full reconstruction surgeon, heavy surgeon, heavy full reconstructive surgery, full rebuild, reconstructive surgeon, etc.. The surgeon must be able to grow tissue from genetic signature, or have connection to builder and reception of technology pharmacy to build (without anabolism or hypertrophy) tissues including eye brain bone cartiledge ligament joint reproductive system, etc.. Some organs should be mechanically replaced in general populace like kidney, lung, liver, heart. storage for original organ shell ok, but not always necessary. Time limit of care depends on society, fund, career age of care provider, resource, land, privacy, defense, army, and trainees. Trainees cannot detain the teacher, the elder, the trainer, etc..
Rebodiment is usually in relation to clones, or regression clones (inc. descendant, embryo, build shell from scratch/tissues, etc.). Universities [UCLA UCD UMASS ; MA; CA TX UT] and USAF are usually starting points for rebodiment surgeons/shell builders, including middle east, and standard general practice with the specific skillset. No trafficking slavery peonage.
Patients that need rebodiment, reconstructive surgery, rebuild, artificial organs, etc., must be referred to designated person by OSG or USA NAC DOM (pref feds) that can assign to university clinic, armed forces clinic base, state hospital clinic (usually out state), out country clinic, specialized clinic, teaching hospital, etc.. All Americans are not eligible for the foreign domain. Americans should stay at university USA NAC DOM branch, local clinic and should begin with beauty surgery/reconstruction minor (limbs lengthen remove muscle fat regraft reset joints/reat ligs/etc.) and artificial organs; or embryo descendant and rebodiment then surgery etc.. Reproductive system should be grown in laboratory from genetic signature; reproductive organ system with beauty youth fertility structure function intact that may procreate bear have progeny always viable 100% success rate etc.. Novel forms including autogamy, sperm units, etc., were developed and debuted between 1800-1900; prior models by elite scientists developed earlier may have been acquired by USA NAC DOM in 1800-1900.
Thank You.
DRAFT
VAR