Blog Archive

Monday, September 27, 2021

09-27-2021-1749 - metalloid

Campagne de financement - Occurrence

metalloid is a type of chemical element which has a preponderance of properties in between, or that are a mixture of, those of metals and nonmetals. There is no standard definition of a metalloid and no complete agreement on which elements are metalloids. Despite the lack of specificity, the term remains in use in the literature of chemistry.

The six commonly recognised metalloids are boronsilicongermaniumarsenicantimony, and tellurium. Five elements are less frequently so classified: carbonaluminiumseleniumpolonium, and astatine. On a standard periodic table, all eleven elements are in a diagonal region of the p-block extending from boron at the upper left to astatine at lower right. Some periodic tables include a dividing line between metals and nonmetals, and the metalloids may be found close to this line.

Typical metalloids have a metallic appearance, but they are brittle and only fair conductors of electricity. Chemically, they behave mostly as nonmetals. They can form alloys with metals. Most of their other physical properties and chemical properties are intermediate in nature. Metalloids are usually too brittle to have any structural uses. They and their compounds are used in alloys, biological agents, catalystsflame retardantsglassesoptical storage and optoelectronicspyrotechnicssemiconductors, and electronics.

The electrical properties of silicon and germanium enabled the establishment of the semiconductor industry in the 1950s and the development of solid-state electronics from the early 1960s.[1]

The term metalloid originally referred to nonmetals. Its more recent meaning, as a category of elements with intermediate or hybrid properties, became widespread in 1940–1960. Metalloids are sometimes called semimetals, a practice that has been discouraged,[2] as the term semimetal has a different meaning in physicsthan in chemistry. In physics, it refers to a specific kind of electronic band structure of a substance. In this context, only arsenic and antimony are semimetals, and commonly recognised as metalloids.

 1314151617
2B
Boron
C
Carbon
N
Nitrogen
O
Oxygen
F
Fluorine
3Al
Aluminium
Si
Silicon
P
Phosphorus
S
Sulfur
Cl
Chlorine
4Ga
Gallium
Ge
Germanium
As
Arsenic
Se
Selenium
Br
Bromine
5In
Indium
Sn
Tin
Sb
Antimony
Te
Tellurium
I
Iodine
6Tl
Thallium
Pb
Lead
Bi
Bismuth
Po
Polonium
At
Astatine
 
  Commonly recognized (86–99%): B, Si, Ge, As, Sb, Te
  Irregularly recognized (40–49%): Po, At
  Less commonly recognized (24%): Se
  Rarely recognized (8–10%): C, Al
  (All other elements cited in less than 6% of sources)
  Arbitrary metal-nonmetal dividing line: between Be and B,Al and SiGe and AsSb and TePo and At

Recognition status, as metalloids, of some elements in the p-block of the periodic table. Percentages are median appearance frequencies in the lists of metalloids.[n 1] The staircase-shaped line is a typical example of the arbitrary metal–nonmetal dividing line found on some periodic tables.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metalloid


The metallic elements in the periodic table located between the transition metals and the weakly nonmetallic metalloids have received many names in the literature, such as post-transition metalspoor metalsother metalsp-block metals and chemically weak metals; none have been recommended by IUPAC. The most common name, post-transition metals, is generally used in this article. Depending on where the adjacent sets of transition metals and metalloids are judged to begin and end, there are at least five competing proposals for which elements to count as post-transition metals: the three most common contain six, ten and thirteen elements, respectively (see image). All proposals include galliumindiumtinthalliumlead, and bismuth.

Physically, these metals are soft (or brittle), have poor mechanical strength, and usually have melting points lower than those of the transition metals. Being close to the metal-nonmetal border, their crystalline structures tend to show covalent or directional bonding effects, having generally greater complexity or fewer nearest neighbours than other metallic elements.

Chemically, they are characterised—to varying degrees—by covalent bonding tendencies, acid-base amphoterism and the formation of anionic species such as aluminatesstannates, and bismuthates (in the case of aluminium, tin, and bismuth, respectively). They can also form Zintl phases (half-metallic compounds formed between highly electropositivemetals and moderately electronegative metals or metalloids).

Post-transition and related metals in the periodic table
  Elements classified as post-transition metals by Masterton, Hurley and Neth:[1] Ga, In, Tl, Sn, Pb, Bi
  Also recognised by Huheey, Keiter and Keiter:[2] Al, Ge, Sb, Po; and by Cox:[3] Zn, Cd, Hg
  Also recognised by Deming:[4] Cu, Ag, Au (but he counted Al and groups 1 and 2 as 'light metals')[n 1]
  Also recognised by Scott & Kanda:[8] Pt
  Elements that might be post-transition metals: At, Cn, Nh, Fl, Mc, Lv, Ts
Also shown is the traditional dividing line between metals and nonmetals. The elements otherwise commonly recognised as metalloids (B, Si Ge, As, Sb, Te) are found to either side of this line.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metals_close_to_the_border_between_metals_and_nonmetals


09-27-2021-1747 - radioactive elements such as plutonium is complicated by the fact that solutions of this element can undergo disproportionation[11] and as a result many different oxidation states can coexist at once.

The disco ball at the historic Roseland Ballroom in NYC, which was built in  1922 and finally closed down on 4/7/2014. Lady Gaga played the final show  of the venue the night

radioactive elements such as plutonium is complicated by the fact that solutions of this element can undergo disproportionation[11] and as a result many different oxidation states can coexist at once. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiochemistry

09-27-2021-1747 - Radiochemistry

Shiny Disco Ball Spinning in Stock Footage Video (100% Royalty-free)  3503570 | Shutterstock

Radiochemistry is the chemistry of radioactive materials, where radioactive isotopes of elements are used to study the properties and chemical reactions of non-radioactive isotopes (often within radiochemistry the absence of radioactivity leads to a substance being described as being inactive as the isotopes are stable). Much of radiochemistry deals with the use of radioactivity to study ordinary chemical reactions. This is very different from radiation chemistry where the radiation levels are kept too low to influence the chemistry.

Radiochemistry includes the study of both natural and man-made radioisotopes.

Main decay modes[edit]

All radioisotopes are unstable isotopes of elements—undergo nuclear decay and emit some form of radiation. The radiation emitted can be of several types including alphabetagamma radiationproton and neutron emission along with neutrino and antiparticle emission decay pathways.

1. α (alpha) radiation—the emission of an alpha particle (which contains 2 protons and 2 neutrons) from an atomic nucleus. When this occurs, the atom's atomic mass will decrease by 4 units and atomic number will decrease by 2.

2. β (beta) radiation—the transmutation of a neutron into an electron and a proton. After this happens, the electron is emitted from the nucleus into the electron cloud.

3. γ (gamma) radiation—the emission of electromagnetic energy (such as gamma rays) from the nucleus of an atom. This usually occurs during alpha or beta radioactive decay.

These three types of radiation can be distinguished by their difference in penetrating power.

Alpha can be stopped quite easily by a few centimetres in air or a piece of paper and is equivalent to a helium nucleus. Beta can be cut off by an aluminium sheet just a few millimetres thick and are electrons. Gamma is the most penetrating of the three and is a massless chargeless high energy photon. Gamma radiation requires an appreciable amount of heavy metal radiation shielding (usually lead or barium-based) to reduce its intensity.

hemical form of the actinides[edit]

The environmental chemistry of some radioactive elements such as plutonium is complicated by the fact that solutions of this element can undergo disproportionation[11] and as a result many different oxidation states can coexist at once. Some work has been done on the identification of the oxidation state and coordination number of plutonium and the other actinides under different conditions.[2] This includes work on both solutions of relatively simple complexes[12][13] and work on colloids[14] Two of the key matrixes are soil/rocks and concrete, in these systems the chemical properties of plutonium have been studied using methods such as EXAFS and XANES.[15][3][4]

Movement of colloids[edit]

While binding of a metal to the surfaces of the soil particles can prevent its movement through a layer of soil, it is possible for the particles of soil which bear the radioactive metal can migrate as colloidal particles through soil. This has been shown to occur using soil particles labeled with 134Cs, these have been shown to be able to move through cracks in the soil.[16]


Action of microorganisms[edit]

The action of micro-organisms can fix uranium; Thermoanaerobacter can use chromium(VI), iron(III), cobalt(III), manganese(IV) and uranium(VI) as electron acceptors while acetateglucosehydrogenlactatepyruvatesuccinate, and xylose can act as electron donors for the metabolism of the bacteria.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiochemistry


09-27-2021-1746 - recognised a small spike at an energy of 803 kilo-electron volts (keV) as the gamma ray signal from polonium-210

Disco balls banned by draconian new law in New South Wales | DJMag.com

 Scientists at AWE were involved in testing for radioactive poison after the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko. No gamma rays were detected; however, the BBC reported that a scientist at AWE, who had worked on Britain's early atomic bomb programme decades before, recognised a small spike at an energy of 803 kilo-electron volts (keV) as the gamma ray signal from polonium-210, a critical component of early nuclear bombs, which led to the correct diagnosis. Further tests using spectroscopy designed to detect alpha radiation confirmed the result.[11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_Weapons_Establishment


09-27-2021-1740 - Operation Plumbbob 1957

Operation Plumbbob was a series of nuclear tests conducted between May 28 and October 7, 1957, at the Nevada Test Site, following Project 57, and preceding Project 58/58A.[1]

Operation Plumbbob
Operation Plumbbob - Priscilla 2.jpg
Plumbbob Priscilla
Information
CountryUnited States
Test site
  • NTS Area 12, Rainier Mesa
  • NTS Areas 5, 11, Frenchman Flat
  • NTS, Areas 1-4, 6-10, Yucca Flat
Period1957
Number of tests29
Test typeballoon, dry surface, high alt rocket (30–80 km), tower, underground shaft, tunnel
Max. yield74 kilotonnes of TNT (310 TJ)
Test series chronology

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Plumbbob

Plumbbob John nuclear test, the only live test ever of a Genie rocket, on 19 July 1957. Fired from a US Air Force F-89J over Yucca FlatsNevada Test Site at an altitude of ~15,000 ft (4.5 km).

An F-89 Scorpion firing the live Genie used in the Plumbbob John test

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIR-2_Genie

The Convair F-102 Delta Dagger[N 2] was an American interceptor aircraft that was built as part of the backbone of the United States Air Force's air defenses in the late 1950s. Entering service in 1956, its main purpose was to intercept invading Soviet strategic bomber fleets (primarily the Tupolev Tu-95) during the Cold War. Designed and manufactured by Convair, 1,000 F-102s were built.

A member of the Century Series, the F-102 was the USAF's first operational supersonic interceptor and delta-wing fighter. It used an internal weapons bay to carry both guided missiles and rockets. As originally designed, it could not achieve Mach 1 supersonic flight until redesigned with area ruling. The F-102 replaced subsonic fighter types such as the Northrop F-89 Scorpion, and by the 1960s, it saw limited service in the Vietnam War in bomber escort and ground-attack roles. It was supplemented by McDonnell F-101 Voodoos and, later, by McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom IIs.

Many of the F-102s were transferred from the active duty Air Force to the Air National Guard by the mid-to-late 1960s, and, with the exception of those examples converted to unmanned QF-102 Full Scale Aerial Target (FSAT) drones, the type was totally retired from operational service in 1976. The follow-on replacement was the Mach-2 Convair F-106 Delta Dart, which was an extensive redesign of the F-102.

F-102 Delta Dagger
Convair YF-102 FC-782.jpg
YF-102 prototype
RoleInterceptor aircraft
ManufacturerConvair
First flight24 October 1953
IntroductionApril 1956
Retired1979[N 1]
Primary usersUnited States Air Force
Greece
Turkey
Number built1,000
Developed fromConvair XF-92
Developed intoF-106 Delta Dart

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convair_F-102_Delta_Dagger

The Convair XF-92 (originally designated XP-92) was an early American delta wing aircraft. Originally conceived as a point-defence interceptor, the design was later used purely for experimental purposes. However, it led Convair to use the delta-wing on a number of designs, including the F-102 Delta DaggerF-106 Delta Dart,  B-58 Hustler, the US Navy's F2Y Sea Dart as well as the VTOL FY Pogo.

XF-92A
Convair XF-92A.jpg
A photo of the Convair XF-92A in flight
RoleInterceptor aircraft
ManufacturerConvair
First flight18 September 1948[1]
StatusCanceled
Primary userUnited States Air Force
Number built1
VariantsConvair F-102 Delta Dagger

Early work[edit]

Mockup of the XP-92.
The XF-92A at Edwards Air Force Base, 1952

Prior to August 1945, the Vultee Division of Consolidated-Vultee looked at the possibility of a swept-wing aircraft powered by a ducted rocket. Years earlier, the company had performed designs which involved liquid-cooled radiator engines. With this design, fuel would be added to the heat produced by small rocket engines in the duct, creating a "pseudo-ramjet".[2]

In August 1945, the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF), soon to be renamed the United States Air Force, issued a proposal for a supersonic interceptor capable of 700 mph (1,100 km/h) speeds and reaching an altitude of 50,000 feet (15,000 m) in four minutes.[citation needed] Several companies responded, among which was Consolidated-Vultee, which submitted its design on 13 October 1945.[2] This design featured swept wings and V-tails, as well as a powerful propulsion system. Besides the ducted rocket, four 1,200 pounds-force (5.3 kN) rockets were positioned at the exhaust nozzle, along with the 1,560 pounds-force (6.9 kN) 19XB turbojet produced by Westinghouse.[2]

A proposal by Consolidated Vultee (later Convair) was accepted in May 1946, with a proposal for a ramjet-powered aircraft, with a 45° swept wing under USAAF Air Materiel Command Secret Project MX-813. However, wind tunnel testing demonstrated a number of problems with this design.[3]

Switch to delta[edit]

Convair found that by straightening the trailing edge and increasing the sweep of the leading edge, the characteristics of their new wing were greatly improved. Thus, contrary to suggestions that German designer Alexander Lippisch influenced it, Convair independently discovered the thin high-speed delta wing.[4] Ralph Shick, chief of aerodynamic research, later met Lippisch at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. This helped to convince him that the thin delta was the way forward, however the influence of Lippisch provided no more than "moral support" and Convair rejected many of his ideas, such as the thick wing of the Lippisch P.13a project and the DM-1 test glider which the US had tested.[5][4]

Power was to be provided by a 1,560 lbf (6,900 N) Westinghouse J30 jet engine assisted by a battery of six 2,000 lbf (8.9 kN) liquid-fueled rockets. This mixed-propulsion system required a very large intake duct, which not only fed the jet engine but also passed air around the rocket exhaust to provide thrust augmentation. Located centrally, the large duct left nowhere to put a traditional cockpit; in its normal location it would have projected deep into the duct. To address this, the team modified the design in a fashion similar to both the Leduc 0.10 and Miles M.52, placing the cockpit in a cylindrical body in the center of the intake. The design was presented to the U.S. Air Force in 1946 and was accepted for development as the XP-92.[6]

Delta research[edit]

In order to gain inflight experience with the delta wing layout, Convair suggested building a smaller prototype, the Model 7002, which the USAAF accepted in November 1946.[7]

In order to save development time and money, many components were taken from other aircraft; the main gear was taken from a  North American FJ-1 Fury, the nosewheel from a Bell P-63 Kingcobra, the engine and hydraulics were taken from a Lockheed P-80 Shooting Star, the ejection seat and cockpit canopy were taken from the cancelled Convair XP-81, and the rudder pedals were taken from a BT-13 trainer.

Construction was well underway at Vultee Field in Downey, California when North American Aviation took over the Vultee plants in summer 1947. The airframe was moved to Convair's plant in San Diego, and completed in the autumn. In December it was shipped without an engine to NACA's Ames Aeronautical Laboratory for wind tunnel testing. After testing was completed, the airframe was returned to San Diego, where it was fitted with a 4,250 lbf (18,900 N) Allison J33-A-21 engine.[6]

By the time the aircraft was ready for testing, the concept of the point-defense interceptor seemed outdated and the (now redesignated) F-92 project was cancelled. They also decided to rename the test aircraft as the XF-92A.[7]

Operational history[edit]

Convair XF-92A in flight with bare metal scheme

In April 1948 the XF-92A was shipped to Muroc Dry Lake (later to become Edwards AFB). Early tests were limited to taxiing, although a short hop was made on 9 June 1948. The XF-92A's first flight was on 18 September 1948 with Convair test pilot Ellis D. "Sam" Shannon at the controls. On 21 December 1948 Bill Martin began testing the aircraft for the company. After 47 flights totaling 20 hours and 33 minutes, the aircraft was turned over to the USAAF on 26 August 1949,[8] with the testing being assigned to Frank Everest and Chuck Yeager.[3]

Yeager was the first Air Force pilot to fly the XF-92A on 13 October 1949.[8] On his second flight he dove the aircraft in a 4 g split-S dive, reaching Mach 1.05 for a brief time.[9] When approaching for landing on this flight he continued to pull the nose higher and higher in order to slow the forward speed to avoid the problems from his first attempt. Surprisingly, the aircraft simply wouldn't stall; he was able to continue raising the nose until he reached 45 degrees pitch, flying under control in that attitude to a landing at 67 mph (108 km/h), 100 mph (160 km/h) slower than Convair had managed.

In 1951, the XF-92A was refitted with an Allison J33-A-29 engine with an afterburner, offering a thrust of 7,500 lbf (33,000 N). The re-engined XF-92A was flown by Yeager for the first time on 20 July 1951. However, there was very little improvement in performance. In addition, there were maintenance problems with this engine and only 21 flights were made during the next 19 months.[3] A final engine change was made to the 5,400 lbf (24,000 N) J33-A-16.

On 9 April 1953, Scott Crossfield began a series of flights on behalf of NACA. These tests revealed a violent pitch-up tendency during high-speed turns, often as much as 6 g, and on one occasion 8 g. The addition of wing fences partially alleviated this problem. Crossfield flew 25 flights in the XF-92A by 14 October 1953.[10] After the aircraft's last flight the nose gear collapsed as Crossfield taxied off the lake bed and the aircraft was retired.[11]

None of the pilots had much good to say about the design. Yeager commented "It was a tricky plane to fly, but ... I got it out to 1.05 Mach." Crossfield was more direct, saying "Nobody wanted to fly the XF-92. There was no lineup of pilots for that airplane. It was a miserable flying beast. Everyone complained it was underpowered."[12][13]

Influence[edit]

Landing accident, 1953

The delta wing's thin airfoil cross section, low weight and structural strength made it a good candidate for a supersonic airplane. The large surface area of 425 ft2 (39 m2) gave a low wing loading which in turn led to good low-speed performance. Very slow landing speeds could be achieved, at the cost of extremely nose-high landing angles and the resulting poor visibility. The combination of good high-speed and low-speed characteristics was very difficult to achieve for other planforms. Although the XF-92 itself was not liked, the design concept clearly had promise and the delta wing was used on several Convair designs through the 1950s and 1960s.

Of particular interest to aircraft designers was the unexpectedly good low-speed behavior Yeager had noticed on his second flight. The aircraft continued to remain controllable at very high angles of attack (alpha), where a conventional layout would have stalled. The reason for this turned out to be the unexpected creation of a large vortex over the top of the wing, generated by the airflow between the fuselage and leading edge of the wing at high alpha. The vortex became "attached" to the upper surface of the wing, supplying it with air moving at speeds much greater than the aircraft's forward speed. By controlling the flow in this critical area, the performance envelope of the delta could be greatly expanded, which led to the introduction of canards on most delta-wing designs in the 1960s and 1970s. More recently "mini-deltas", in the form of leading edge extensions, have become common on most fighter aircraft, creating the vortex over a more conventional wing planform.

Aircraft on display[edit]

XF-92A at the NMUSAF on August 31, 2017.

Operators[edit]

 United States

Specifications (XF-92A)[edit]

Orthographically projected diagram of the XF-92A.

Data from Fighters of the United States Air Force[15]

General characteristics

  • Crew: 1
  • Length: 42 ft 6 in (12.95 m)
  • Wingspan: 31 ft 4 in (9.55 m)
  • Height: 17 ft 9 in (5.41 m)
  • Wing area: 425 sq ft (39.5 m2)
  • Airfoil: NACA 65-006.5[16]
  • Empty weight: 9,078 lb (4,118 kg)
  • Gross weight: 14,608 lb (6,626 kg)
  • Powerplant: 1 × Allison J33-A-29 afterburning turbojet engine, 4,500 lbf (20 kN) thrust dry, 7,500 lbf (33 kN) with afterburner

Performance

  • Maximum speed: 718 mph (1,156 km/h, 624 kn)
  • Service ceiling: 50,750 ft (15,470 m)
  • Rate of climb: 8,135 ft/min (41.33 m/s)
  • Wing loading: 34 lb/sq ft (170 kg/m2)
  • Thrust/weight: 0.51

Popular culture[edit]

Convair XF-92A painted as a fictional MiG-23 for the movie Jet Pilot

An unusual application of the XF-92A was as a movie model, stepping into the role of the "MiG-23" in the Howard Hughes film, Jet Pilot, starring John Wayne and Janet Leigh. Due to the lengthy delay in releasing the film, by the time it appeared in 1957, the XF-92A's role had been left on the cutting room floor.[17] It did appear in the film Toward the Unknown (1956) starring William Holden, again in the guise of another aircraft, this time, the F-102 Delta Dagger.[18]

See also[edit]

Related development

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convair_XF-92

The Convair F-106 Delta Dart was the primary all-weather interceptor aircraft of the United States Air Force from the 1960s through to the 1980s. Designed as the so-called "Ultimate Interceptor", it proved to be the last specialist interceptor in U.S. Air Force service to date. It was gradually retired during the 1980s, with the QF-106 drone conversions of the aircraft being used until 1998 under the Pacer Six program.[1][2][3]

F-106 Delta Dart
194thFIS-F-106-58-0797-ADC-CA-ANG.jpg
A Convair F-106 of the California Air National Guard
RoleFighter interceptor
ManufacturerConvair
First flight26 December 1956
IntroductionJune 1959
RetiredAugust 1988 (ANG); 1998 (NASA)
Primary usersUnited States Air Force
Air National Guard
Number built342 (2 prototypes, 277 F-106A, 63 F-106B)
Developed fromConvair F-102 Delta Dagger

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convair_F-106_Delta_Dart

WS-201A, informally known as the 1954 Interceptor, was a United States Air Force project to develop a dedicated interceptor aircraft that would enter service in 1954. Several aircraft were developed as part of the project, leading to the F-102 Delta DaggerF-106 Delta DartRepublic XF-103 and, indirectly, the F-101B Voodoo and F-104 Starfighter. The electronics and weapons developed for the program would become common on US designs, including the AIM-4 Falcon missile and a variety of Hughes Aircraft-supplied radar and fire control systems. The project also led, eventually, to the upgrading of the SAGE battle control computers to directly control the interceptors for much of their flight. Although greatly delayed, the resulting systems operated for approximately 20 years, into the 1980s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WS-201