1. In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future.[1]Criminal law in some countries or for some conspiracies may require that at least one overt act be undertaken in furtherance of that agreement, to constitute an offense. There is no limit on the number participating in the conspiracy and, in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect (compare attempts which require proximity to the full offense). For the purposes of concurrence, the actus reus is a continuing one and parties may join the plot later and incur joint liability and conspiracy can be charged where the co-conspirators have been acquitted or cannot be traced. Finally, repentance by one or more parties does not affect liability (unless, in some cases, it occurs before the parties have committed overt acts) but may reduce their sentence.
An unindicted co-conspirator, or unindicted conspirator, is a person or entity that is alleged in an indictment to have engaged in conspiracy, but who is not charged in the same indictment. Prosecutors choose to name persons as unindicted co-conspirators for a variety of reasons including grants of immunity, pragmatic considerations, and evidentiary concerns.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(criminal)
2. A civil conspiracy or collusion is an agreement between two or more parties to deprive a third party of legal rights or deceive a third party to obtain an illegal objective.[1] A conspiracy may also refer to a group of people who make an agreement to form a partnership in which each member becomes the agent or partner of every other member and engage in planning or agreeing to commit some act. It is not necessary that the conspirators be involved in all stages of planning or be aware of all details. Any voluntary agreement and some overt act by one conspirator in furtherance of the plan are the main elements necessary to prove a conspiracy. A conspiracy may exist whether legal means are used to accomplish illegal results, or illegal means used to accomplish something legal.[2] "Even when no crime is involved, a civil action for conspiracy may be brought by the persons who were damaged."[1]
In the law of tort, the legal elements necessary to establish a civil conspiracy are substantially the same as for establishing a criminal conspiracy, i.e. there is an agreement between two or more natural persons to break the law at some time in the future or to achieve a lawful aim by unlawful means. The criminal law often requires one of the conspirators to take an overt step to accomplish the illegal act to demonstrate the reality of their intention to break the law, whereas in a civil conspiracy, an overt act towards accomplishing the wrongful goal may not be required. Etymologically, the term comes from Latin con- "with, together", and spirare "to breathe".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(civil)
Warefaring Covers
1. (War by USA-etc.-et-al. w/o declared war; trafficking ring sustenance; stolen child working/paid/ID/mischling@SS=Stoch/specpriv (inc. reworded)/etc. esp. as federal/local/state/national/international/etc. clandestine-public-CL1-underground-extraterrestrial-exploratory-experimental-etc. occurance-ops-etc. (Maine State USA NAC DOM; USA); victim original injured-enhostaged (few actual sires/mares, all are unwilling, all are et enhost or dead, all are w/ framed-id); etc.; cloning with brain transplant, transplant petersen brain into stolen shell of sup gen line; head of fielding neanderthals - grayden; reverse fielding by mind/psychology to confer on chainey-italian-psychopath non-psychopath privilege and to permit him to frame any as psychopath in his place, etc. (to reveal large espionage fan/etc. base of italian-psychopath); overfunding criminals/foster children/stolen children/traffickers/aberrations/abominations/perturbations/derivations/deviations/theft/integrants/stolen/steal/theif/stolen gene/stolen product/stolen part/stolen material/stole Intellectual property/etc. and to sustain trafficking theft of intellectual property by trafficker family with stolen child (both knowing guilty evidence present with illness-cover of denial/argument/refutation/etc. and due awareness/knowing of heavy punishment/sentence/extermination/etc. awaiting their family lines (their fated end is known) - however, trafficker w/ stolen child family continue to attack their victims despite victims with special privilege and no need for cover, and je'accus espionage or trafficker or stolen child or etc. to victim in endeavor to transfer their sentence/guilty-verdict onto the innocent; time limited endeavors before switch to new victim group; etc.). Four violences.
2. Crimes by Petersen to injure birthright required petersen to fac conspiracy over and down her line 100+ years; as a degenerate. Petersen facted conspiracy as a US resident/citizen accused/etc. (accuse of US citizenship by birth and fam and resource and welfaring etc.) to avoid revelation of her crimes against humanity, genocide, mass self procreation, mass trafficking of non-self, cover up of scientist enhostage w/ reframing/rebody/organ trans/etc., espionage, traitorism, antiscience/fsci (e.g. 'DSM' psychopathology/psychiatry/social work/etc. principles/premises/ideas/thoughts/actions/etc.), secrecy, deception, conspiracy, targeted victims, criminal victim indiscriminacy (neander gene/mind), lie and wait stalking predatory behaviors with weapon (gun), petersen stolen child hand off with knowing theft (vul-cr-traff-esp-etc.) from body of non-self, mass trafficking of birthright, stolen shells, foreign country planting of petersen and her victims, espionage, contracting/agreements, business, clandestine, self-ranking, antagonism to right of superior, je 'accus tactics, witching birthright (attempting to papenheimer fam situ birthright), etc..
3. Petersen not intelligence (high gang committance; where group is a gang not a humane/etc. group etc.) means no freedom by betrayal and treason.
4. https://nikiyaantonbettey.blogspot.com/2021/08/08-05-2021-1819-draft-copy-section.html
- 5.
- Antiscience - Grayden (character analysis with character is disease is disorder is etc.; anti to natural/empirical measure/ostensible/etc. biological-chemical-physical cause for disease of dombiological-organism (tri-plane biology chemistry physics; biological dominance traditional; biological organism hierarchy p-c-b [system] in p-c-b env [surroundings] etc.))
- Civil - USA
- Criminal - USA
- Political - USA
- Secrecy - USA
False flag operation conspiracy theories[edit]
Several claims have been made in Spanish-speaking media that the sinking was a false flag operation conducted by the U.S.[85][86] and those claims are the official view in Cuba.[87] The Maine monument in Havana describes Maine's sailors as "victims sacrificed to the imperialist greed in its fervor to seize control of Cuba",[88] which claims that U.S. agents deliberately blew up their own ship.[89]
Eliades Acosta was the head of the Cuban Communist Party's Committee on Culture and a former director of the José Martà National Library in Havana. He offered the standard Cuban interpretation in an interview to The New York Times, but he adds that "Americans died for the freedom of Cuba, and that should be recognized."[87] This claim has also been made in Russia by Mikhail Khazin, a Russian economist who once ran the cultural section at Komsomolskaya Pravda,[90] and in Spain by Eric Frattini, a Spanish Peruvian journalist in his book Manipulando la historia. Operaciones de Falsa Bandera. Del Maine al Golpe de estado de TurquÃa.[91]
Operation Northwoods was a series of proposals prepared by Pentagon officials for the Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962, setting out a number of proposed false flag operations that could be blamed on the Cuban Communists in order to rally support against them.[92][93] One of these suggested that a U.S. Navy ship be blown up in Guantanamo Bay deliberately. In an echo of the yellow press headlines of the earlier period, it used the phrase "A 'Remember the Maine' incident".[93][94]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Maine_(1889)#False_flag_operation_conspiracy_theories
A false flag operation is an act committed with the intent of disguising the actual source of responsibility and pinning blame on another party.
The term "false flag" originated in the 16th century as a purely figurative expression to mean "a deliberate misrepresentation of someone's affiliation or motives".[1]It was later used to describe a ruse in naval warfare whereby a vessel flew the flag of a neutral or enemy country in order to hide its true identity. The tactic was originally used by pirates and privateers to deceive other ships into allowing them to move closer before attacking them. It later was deemed an acceptable practice during naval warfare according to international maritime laws, provided the attacking vessel displayed its true flag once an attack had begun.[2][3][4][5]
The term today extends to include countries that organize attacks on themselves and make the attacks appear to be by enemy nations or terrorists, thus giving the nation that was supposedly attacked a pretext for domestic repression and foreign military aggression.[6]
Similarly deceptive activities carried out during peacetime by individuals or non governmental organizations can (by extension) also be called false flag operations, but the more common legal term is a "frameup", "stitch up", or "setup".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
The redemption movement is a debt-resistance movement and fraud scheme active primarily in the United States and Canada.[1]Participants allege that a secret fund is created for everyone at birth, and that a procedure exists to "redeem" or reclaim this fund to pay bills. Common redemption schemes include acceptance for value (A4V), Treasury Direct Accounts (TDA) and secured party creditor kits.
Although the movement has maintained a following since the 1990s, its theories are false and meritless. Those who participate in redemption schemes, and especially those who promote them to other people, can face criminal charges and imprisonment. Several government institutions have issued warnings about the fraudulent character of redemption schemes.
The ideas of the redemption movement should not be confused with the actual legal right of redemption, under which a debtor may buy back property that has been levied or foreclosed, either by paying the balance of the debt or by matching the price at which the property sells.[2][3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redemption_movement
The sovereign-citizen movement is a loose grouping of primarily American litigants, commentators, tax protesters, and financial-scheme promoters, who see themselves as answerable only to their particular interpretations of the common law and as not subject to any government statutes or proceedings.[1] In the United States, they do not recognize U.S. currency and maintain that they are "free of any legal constraints".[2][3][4] They especially reject most forms of taxation as illegitimate.[5] Participants in the movement argue this concept in opposition to the idea of "federal citizens", who, they say, have unknowingly forfeited their rights by accepting some aspect of federal law.[6] The doctrines of the movement resemble those of the freemen on the land movement more commonly found in the British Commonwealth, such as Australia and Canada.[7][8][9][10]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement
The oral polio vaccine (OPV) AIDS hypothesis states that the AIDS pandemic originated from live polio vaccines prepared in chimpanzee tissue cultures, accidentally contaminated with SIV virus and then administered to up to one million Africans between 1957 and 1960 in experimental mass vaccination campaigns.
Data analyses in molecular biology and phylogenetic studies contradict the OPV AIDS hypothesis; consequently, scientific consensus regards the hypothesis as disproven.[1][2][3][4] The journal Nature has described the hypothesis as "refuted".[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oral_polio_vaccine_AIDS_hypothesis
No comments:
Post a Comment