Blog Archive

Sunday, May 21, 2023

05-21-2023-0206 - Helix, snail, earthworm, etc. (draft)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Helix
Temporal range: Miocene–recent
Helix pomatia 89a.jpg
Helix pomatia
Scientific classification e
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Mollusca
Class: Gastropoda
Subclass: Heterobranchia
Order: Stylommatophora
Family: Helicidae
Subfamily: Helicinae
Tribe: Helicini
Genus: Helix
Linnaeus, 1758
Type species
Helix pomatia

Helix is a genus of large, air-breathing land snails native to the western Palaearctic and characterized by a globular shell.[1][2] It is the type genus of the family Helicidae, and one of the animal genera described by Carl Linnaeus.[3] Members of the genus first appeared during the Miocene.[4] Well-known species include Helix pomatia (Roman snail, Burgundy snail, or edible snail) and Helix lucorum (Turkish snail). Cornu aspersum (garden snail), though externally similar and long classified as a member of Helix (as "Helix aspersa"), is not closely related to Helix[5][6] and belongs to a different tribe of Helicinae.[7]

Taxonomy

In Linnaeus' 10th edition of Systema Naturae, which marks the beginning of the zoological nomenclature, the generic name Helix had been used for a variety of terrestrial (e.g. Zonites algirus), freshwater (e.g. Lymnaea stagnalis), and marine (e.g. Fossarus ambiguus) gastropods; later this was restricted to stylommatophoran species with flattened to globular shells, including zonitids and other groups. In the course of the 1800s, more groups were removed, but prior to 1900, several thousand helicid and hygromiid species of Europe and abroad had still been classified in the genus Helix.[8][9] By the early 1900s, the genus was split into many separate genera, leaving only some 30 species closely related to its type species Helix pomatia in the genus. However, due to the previously broad concept of the genus, Helix is part of the original combination (basionym) of many gastropod names and there still are many nominal taxa described in Helix whose generic placement remains unresolved (taxa inquirenda),[10] although they clearly do not refer to any species of Helix in its present sense.

In the 2000s, Helix has been subject to extensive molecular phylogenetic studies and taxonomic revisions.[1][11][2][12][13] These led to the exclusion of several species, most notably the garden snail, and inclusion of others (H. ceratina, H. nicaeensis). Maltzanella, for long considered a subgenus of Helix, is the sister group of Helix.

Two subgenera are currently recognized:[2]

Description

Helix comprises large land snails species, with shell diameter of 2-6 cm. The shell is globular to conical, with five darker bands that may be reduced or fuse together. The globular shell distinguishes Helix from most of the related genera (tribe Helicini), except for Maltzanella and Lindholmia. The surface has a structure of fine transversal ribs, developed to a varying degree, and there may be very fine spiral grooves as well. The shell is never malleated. Colour of the foot varies. It may be grey, brown, black or pink; the back of the foot is dark in several species.

Characters on the genital system have been used to define the genus and its subgenera. Unlike Cornu, the penis of Helix contains two papillae with a central opening. There appears to be a tendency for a shortening of the diverticulum of bursa copulatrix and of the eppiphallus, but there is an overlap with related genera in these characters. Mucous glands adjoining the dart sac are ususally richly branched.

Distribution

Helix is a western Palaearctic genus. The species diversity is concentrated to the Balkans and Anatolia, with the greatest phylogenetic diversity in Greece. The natural western distribution limits run through mainland France (Helix pomatia), Corsica (Helix ceratina), and Algeria (Helix melanostoma). In the north, the natural distribution of H. pomatia reaches central Germany and the southern margins of the North European plain. The southernmost species live in North Africa (H. melanostoma, H. pronuba) and the southern Levant (H. engaddensis). The eastern limits are reached in western Iran and Iraqi Kurdistan (H. salomonica) and in the Caucasus (H. lucorum); H. thessalica reaches through Ukraine at least to the western Russian frontier.[1][2]

Genetics

The haploid number of chromosomes is 27 (studied species were H. lucorum, H. buchii, H. pomatia, H. gussoneana and H. straminea).[14][15][16][17] In H. pomatia, all chromosomes have median or sub-median centromeres.[18] Small supernumerary chromosomes were reported from H. pomatia from England.[18]

Haploid genome size was estimated to be nearly 4 Gbp (C-value 4 pg) with a GC-content of ~42%,[19][20] but its is unclear which species was studied due to a discrepancy between the stated species and sample origin.

Genital system

The structure of the genital system corresponds in most aspects to that of other Helicidae. Its anatomy and function has been studied in detail in H. pomatia.[21][22][23]

As all stylommatophorans, Helix snails are hermaphrodites. Sperms and egg cells are produced in a common gonad, the ovotestis (hermaphroditic gland), which is embedded in the hepatopancreas (digestive gland) near the apex of the shell. Gametes are transported through a hermaphroditic duct (ovotestis duct) to the fertilization pouch–spermatheca complex (carrefour) embedded at the base of the albumen gland.[24] In this organ, the foreign sperm is stored in spermathecal sacs (receptacula seminis) and egg fertilization takes place in the fertilisation pouch. The albumen gland provides the provision of the developing fertilized eggs, and its size greatly varies with the stage of the reproductive cycle. Own sperm and fertilized eggs are transported by specialised regions of the spermoviduct (sperm groove and uterus), which distally separate into a male (vas deferens) and female (free oviduct) parts of the genital system.[24]

The male genitalia consist of a tube that serves the formation of a spermatophore and its transfer into the female parts of the mating partner. Penis is the most distal and muscular part. A spermatophore is built in the epiphallus (between vas deferens and penis) and the flagellum (continuation of the epiphallus proximally from the vas deferens opening); flagellum (the latter forms the tail of the spermatophore. During copulation, the penis everts (like a sleeve turned inside out)[21] and is in this process inserted in the vagina. A retractor muscle attaches on the epiphallus.

The female part consists of a vagina, the dart apparatus that opens into it and the bursa copulatrix (gametolytic gland). Vagina serves the transport of the foreign spermatophore and of eggs. The bursa is attached by a thin stalk to the vagina (marking the boundary between vagina and the free oviduct). The stalk in most cases bears a diverticulum, a blind tube that receives the front part of the spermatophore if present. The diverticulum has been proposed to be a remnant of a seminal duct that originally transported foreign sperm (sperm from the other individual) into the fertilization pouch.[25] Sperm leave the tail of the spermatophore and migrate into the oviduct and then to the fertilization pouch; vast majority of the sperm does not escape in this way and is digested in the bursa.[23][24] In Helix, there is tendency for a reduction of the diverticulum, and it can be missing in several species.[2]

The dart apparatus is composed of a muscular dart sac and two mucous glands (digitiform glands) on its sides. The mucous glands are banched at the base; the number of branches varies between Helix species. The dart is aragonitic, straight or only weakly curved, with four blades (vanes) along its length and a corona at its base.[26][5] Dart apparatus is missing in Helix salomonica.[2]

The male and female parts open into a common atrium and a genital pore positioned ventrally behind the right optic tentacle.

Reproduction

Helix pomatia in the initial phase of the mating sequence.

The aspects of reproduction have been studied primarily in H. pomatia, with limited information from other species.

Mating behaviour has been described several times for H. pomatia.[21][27] In the initial phase, the two snails raise their foots and press the soles against each other and touch each others tentacles and mouthparts. This takes 15–30 min. Some time later, the dart shooting takes place, although many matings progress without a love dart being employed. The mucous glands produce a whittish secretion just before the shooting, that contains hormones promoting the compound that improves preservation of foreign sperm in the receiving individual.[28] Then, again after a pause, comes the copulation, usually preceded by several unsuccessful attempts in which the reciprocal insertion of penes is not achieved and the genital organs are partially retracted back into the body. Finally, both individuals simultaneously insert the penes into each others female opening. Within ca. 4–7 min the spermatophore is formed and transferred, after which the snail disengage and retract the everted genital organs. However, the complete reception of the spermatophore takes another 2-3 hours, during which the snails remain partially retracted and inactive.[29][30]

It has been reported that only one spermatophore is usually transferred during copulation in H. pomatia, so one animal functions as a male and one as a female in each mating. According to that report it is mostly the older snail who lay eggs, while younger function as males.[29]

Received foreign sperm may be stored for more than a year before fertilization.[23]

In H. pomatia, eggs are laid into a chamber dug in the soil by the parent 4–6 days after mating.[29] Eggs are formed only as the nest is built.[31] As in other pulmonates, the eggs are rich in galactogen produced by the albumen gland. The eggshell is partially mineralized, with crystals of calcium cabonate in a flexible membrane.[24] Hatching follows roughly 25–26 days after egg laying, but the snails remain additional 8–10 days in the nest.[29]

Life history

From April through the northern summer, the number of snails copulating increases due to the higher temperature and humidity, which enhance the possibility of oviposition. The pulmonate snails are hermaphroditic, meaning that both female and male sexual organs are present in the same individual. The snails produce both eggs and sperm in the ovotestis (also called the hermaphrodite gland), but it is later separated into two divisions, a sperm duct and oviduct, respectively.

In H. pomatia, sexual maturity is typically reached after 2-3 overwinterings, i.e. at the age of 2-4 years.[29] Some individuals may live longer, perhaps even 30 years or older in the case of the H. pomatia[32] but most live less than 8 years[citation needed]. Many deaths are due to predators and parasites.

Ecology and behaviour

Species of Helix live in a variety of habitats and under very different climatic regimes. Some species are exclusively found in open limestone rocky habitats (H. secernenda), while others tolerate acidic bedrock (e.g. H. pelagonesica) or live predominantly in forests (e.g. H. thessalica). Members of the genus occur from temperate rainforests (H. buchii) to semi-arid regions.

Biotic interactions

Some bird species, like corvids, prey on Helix species.[citation needed]

The kinetoplastid Cryptobia helicis lives in the bursa copulatrix of Helix pomatia.[23]

Human use

Some species, above all H. pomatia and H. lucorum, are being collected or farmed for human consumption.[citation needed] The culinary use dates back several millenia and has been evidenced for several species across the genus' range. Mesolithic shell midden dated to 9370±80 and 8110±90 uncalibrated C-14 years bp and providing evidence of collecting was documented for H. pomatella in Abruzzo, Italy.[33]

Conservation

Most of the species included in the IUCN Red List are classified as Least Concern.[34] One of the species, H. ceratina, is critically endangered and the present known distribution is limited to a very small area near the Ajaccio airport.[35]

In the past, collection of wild H. pomatia for food led to fears of over-exploitation and the introduction of protection by law in several countries.[36]

List of extant species

Scientific name IUCN Red List Status Distribution Picture
Helix albescens
Rossmässler, 1839
LC IUCN Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia,

Russia, Ukraine[1]

2015-07-02-0668(0) (19341856612).jpg
Helix anctostoma
Martens, 1874



Helix antiochiensis
Kobelt, 1896


Helix tripolitana (MNHN-IM-2000-27767).jpeg
Helix asemnis
Bourguignat, 1860
LC IUCN Helix-asemnis-map-eur-nm-moll.jpg Helix asemnis.jpg
Helix borealis
Mousson, 1859
DD IUCN
HeboGR39 010.jpg
Helix buchii
(Dubois de Montpéreux, 1840)


Helix buchii Turkey.jpg
Helix calabrica
Westerlund, 1876



Helix ceratina
Shuttleworth, 1843

Tyrrhenaria-ceratina-map-eur-nm-moll.jpg Tyrrhenaria ceratina (MNHN-IM-2010-13180).jpeg
Helix cincta
O. F. Müller, 1774
LC IUCN Syria, Turkey (partly probably introduced),

Cyprus (probably introduced),

Greece (east Aegean, probably introduced),

Croatia (introduced), Slovenia (introduced),

Italy (introduced)[1][37]

Helix cincta cincta 01.JPG
Helix dormitoris
Kobelt, 1898

Helix-dormitoris-map-eur-nm-moll.jpg Helix dormitoris.jpg
Helix engaddensis
Bourguignat, 1852

Israel, West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon[38] Helix engaddensis 2019.jpg
Helix escherichi
O. Boettger, 1898

Helix-escherichi-map-eur-nm-moll.jpg
Helix fathallae
Nägele, 1901



Helix figulina
Rossmässler, 1839
LC IUCN Helix-figulina-map-eur-nm-moll.jpg 1k Helix-figulina 01.jpg
Helix godetiana
Kobelt, 1878



Helix gussoneana
L. Pfeiffer, 1848



Helix kazouiniana
Pallary, 1939



Helix ligata
O. F. Müller, 1774
DD IUCN Helix-ligata-map-eur-nm-moll.jpg Helix ligata.jpg
Helix lucorum
Linnaeus, 1758

Helix-lucorum-map-eur-nm-moll.jpg Helix lucorum 2.jpg
Helix lutescens
Rossmässler, 1837
LC IUCN Helix-lutescens-map-eur-nm-moll.jpg Helix lutescens RO.jpg
Helix melanostoma
Draparnaud, 1801

Tunisia, Algeria, France (introduced), Spain (introduced) Helix melanostoma 01.JPG
Helix mileti
Kobelt, 1906

Helix-mileti-map-eur-nm-moll.jpg
Helix nicaeensis
A. Férussac, 1821

Turkey Nicaeensis.tif
Helix nucula
Mousson, 1854
LC IUCN Lebanon, Syria, Cyprus,

Turkey (partly probably introduced)[1]


Helix pachya
Bourguignat, 1860



Helix pathetica
Mousson, 1854



Helix pelagonesica
(Rolle, 1898)



Helix philibinensis
Rossmässler, 1839
LC IUCN
Helix figulina 01.jpg
Helix pomacella
Mousson, 1854
LC IUCN Helix-pomacella-map-eur-nm-moll.jpg
Helix pomatella
Kobelt, 1876



Helix pomatia
Linnaeus, 1758


Helix pomatia 89a.jpg
Helix pronuba
Westerlund & Blanc, 1879


Helix nucula shell(s) 06.jpg
Helix salomonica
Nägele, 1899



Helix schlaeflii
Mousson, 1859

Albania (central and southern), Greece,

North Macedonia (Galičica)[2][1]


Helix secernenda
Rossmässler, 1847
LC IUCN Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro,

Albania (northern)[2][1]


Helix straminea
Briganti, 1825
LC IUCN

Helix thessalica
O. Boettger, 1886
LC IUCN
Helix thessalica.jpg
Helix valentini
Kobelt, 1891
EN IUCN Helix-valentini-map-eur-nm-moll.jpg
Helix vladika
(Kobelt, 1898)
LC IUCN
Helix vladika RS.jpg

Fossil record

Several extinct species of Helix have been described (the list is not complete):

  • Helix jasonis Mayer, 1856 (Ukraine: Sevastopol. Miocene: Tortonian[39])
  • Helix pseudoligata Sinzov, 1897 (Ukraine. Miocene: Sarmatian[39])
  • Helix toulai Kojumdgieva, 1969 (Bulgaria: Balchik. Miocene: Sarmatian)
  • Helix barbeyana De Stefani in De Stefani et al., 1891
  • Helix krejcii Wenz in Krejci-Graf & Wenz, 1926
  • Helix mrazeci Sevastos, 1922
  • Helix sublutescens Wenz in Krejci & Wenz, 1926

Some extant species are known from Quaternary deposits. The most studied species in this respect is H. pomatia, where the fossils have been used to document the earliest postglacial occurrences in Central Europe.[40] The earliest record in Czechia was dated directly by radiocarbon to 10120-9690 BP (but is likely a few hundred years younger);[41] fossils presumably older than 9402–9027 BP[42] or 9403–9003 BP[43] were found in Baden-Würtemberg, Germany.

Phylogeny

The phylogenetic relationships between Helix and related genera as well as the internal relationships within the genus have been so far studied only using partial sequences of mitochondrial genes and of the nuclear rRNA gene cluster.[44][1]

The cladogram shown is based on phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial sequence data.[45][11][37][1]

Maltzanella

Maltzanella maltzani



Maltzanella dickhauti



Helix
Helix (Pelasga)

Helix figulina



Helix nucula



Helix kazouiniana



Helix salomonica



Helix engaddensis



Helix (Helix)
Mediterranean clade


Helix fathallae




Helix anctostoma



Helix valentini



Helix cincta





Helix melanostoma



Helix pronuba



Helix borealis




Helix ligata



Helix mileti



Helix pomatella



Helix gussoneana



Helix calabrica




Helix ceratina



European clade

Helix lutescens



Helix secernenda



Helix thessalica



Helix pomatia



Helix dormitoris



Helix shlaeflii




Helix vladika



Helix straminea




Anatolian clade


Helix asemnis



Helix escherichi




Helix pathetica



Helix pomacella




Helix nicaeensis



Helix lucorum





Helix albescens



Helix philibinensis



Helix pelagonesica



Helix buchii




Helix godetiana




Synonyms

The following genus-level taxa are considered synonyms of Helix:

  • Callunea Scudder, 1882
  • Cochlea Da Costa, 1778
  • Coenatoria Held, 1838
  • Cunula Pallary, 1936
  • Glischrus S. Studer, 1820
  • Helicites W. Martin, 1809 (Established for fossils of Helix to distinguish them from extant members of that taxon. Invalid, available only for the purposes of the Principle of Homonymy (Art. 20))
  • Helicogena A. Férussac, 1821
  • Megastoma Scudder, 1882
  • Naegelea P. Hesse, 1918
  • Pachyphallus P. Hesse, 1918
  • Pentataenia A. Schmidt, 1855 (junior objective synonym)
  • Physospira Boettger, 1914
  • Pomatia Beck, 1837
  • Pomatiana Fagot, 1903
  • Pomatiella Pallary, 1909
  • Pseudofigulina P. Hesse, 1917
  • Rhododerma P. Hesse, 1918
  • Tacheopsis Boettger, 1909
  • Tammouzia Pallary, 1939

References


  • Korábek, Ondřej; Juřičková, Lucie; Petrusek, Adam (January 2022). "Diversity of Land Snail Tribe Helicini (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Helicidae): Where Do We Stand after 20 Years of Sequencing Mitochondrial Markers?". Diversity. 14 (1): 24. doi:10.3390/d14010024. ISSN 1424-2818.

  • Neubert, Eike (2014). "Revision of Helix Linnaeus, 1758 in its eastern Mediterranean distribution area, and reassignment of Helix godetiana Kobelt, 1878 to Maltzanella Hesse, 1917 (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Helicidae)". Contributions to Natural History. 26: 1–200.

  • Linnaeus, C. (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum caracteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Stockholm. p. 768.

  • Harzhauser, Mathias; Neubauer, Thomas A. (1 June 2021). "A review of the land snail faunas of the European Cenozoic – composition, diversity and turnovers". Earth-Science Reviews. 217: 103610. Bibcode:2021ESRv..21703610H. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103610. ISSN 0012-8252. S2CID 233835790.

  • Koene, Joris M; Schulenburg, Hinrich (2005). "Shooting darts: co-evolution and counter-adaptation in hermaphroditic snails". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 5 (1): 25. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-5-25. PMC 1080126. PMID 15799778.

  • Giusti, F.; Manganelli, G.; Schembri, P. J. (1995). The non-marine molluscs of the Maltese Islands. Torino.

  • Neiber, Marco T; Korábek, Ondřej; Glaubrecht, Matthias; Hausdorf, Bernhard (11 April 2022). "A misinterpreted disjunction: the phylogenetic relationships of the North African land snail Gyrostomella (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Helicidae)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 194 (4): 1236–1251. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab059. ISSN 0024-4082.

  • Westerlund, C. A. 1889. Fauna der in der paläarctischen Region (Europa, Kaukasien, Sibirien, Turan, Persien, Kurdistan, Armenien, Mesopotamien, Kleinasien, Syrien, Arabien, Egypten, Tripolis, Tunesien, Algerien und Marocco) lebenden Binnenconchylien. II. Gen. Helix. - pp. 1-473, 1-31, 1-8. Berlin. (Friedländer).

  • Pfeiffer, L. & Clessin, S. 1881. Nomenclator heliceorum viventium quo continetur nomina omnium hujus familiae generum et specierum hodie cognitarum, disposita ex affinitate naturali. - pp. 1-617. Cassellis. (Fischer).

  • MolluscaBase eds. (2023). "MolluscaBase. Helix Linnaeus, 1758". MolluscaBase. Retrieved 29 April 2023. {{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)

  • Fiorentino, V.; Manganelli, G.; Giusti, F.; Ketmaier, V. (1 May 2016). "Recent expansion and relic survival: Phylogeography of the land snail genus Helix (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from south to north Europe". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 98: 358–372. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.017. ISSN 1055-7903. PMID 26926944.

  • Korábek, Ondřej; Petrusek, Adam; Neubert, Eike; Juřičková, Lucie (2015). "Molecular phylogeny of the genus Helix (Pulmonata: Helicidae)". Zoologica Scripta. 44 (3): 263–280. doi:10.1111/zsc.12101. S2CID 84673484.

  • Manganelli, Giuseppe; Salomone, Nicola; Giusti, Folco (2005). "A molecular approach to the phylogenetic relationships of the western palaearctic Helicoidea (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora)". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 85 (4): 501–512. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00514.x.

  • Bakhtadze, N. G.; Chakvetadze, N. L.; Mumladze, L. J.; Bakhtadze, G. I.; Tskhadaia, E. A. (2016). "Karyological Data of Terrestrial Mollusks (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Pulmonata) of Georgia" (PDF). Proceedings of the Institute of Zoology (Ilia State University, Tbilisi). 25: 23–27.

  • Perrot, Jean-Louis; Perrot, Max (1937). "La formule chromosomique de l'Helix pomatia". Revue Suisse de Zoologie. 44: 203–209.

  • Petraccioli, Agnese; Crovato, Paolo; Guarino, Fabio Maria; Mezzasalma, Marcello; Odierna, Gaetano; Picariello, Orfeo; Maio, Nicola (2021). "Chromosome Diversity and Evolution in Helicoide a (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora): A Synthesis from Original and Literature Data". Animals. 11 (9): 2551. doi:10.3390/ani11092551. ISSN 2076-2615. PMC 8470273. PMID 34573517.

  • Petraccioli, A.; Niero, I.; Carandente, F.; Crovato, P.; de VICO, G.; Odierna, G.; Picariello, O. L. A.; Tardy, E.; Viglietti, S.; Guarino, F. M.; Maio, N. (1 January 2021). "Helix straminea Briganti, 1825 in Italy (Gastropoda: Pulmonata): taxonomic history, morphology, biology, distribution and phylogeny". The European Zoological Journal. 88 (1): 390–416. doi:10.1080/24750263.2021.1892217. S2CID 234221660.

  • Evans, H. J. (1960). "Supernumerary chromosomes in wild populations of the snail Helix pomatia L." Heredity. 15 (2): 129–138. doi:10.1038/hdy.1960.70. ISSN 1365-2540.

  • Vinogradov, Alexander E (1 February 2000). "Larger genomes for molluskan land pioneers". Genome. 43 (1): 211–212. doi:10.1139/g99-063. ISSN 0831-2796.

  • "Genomes on a Tree". goat.genomehubs.org. Retrieved 11 May 2023.

  • Meisenheimer, Johannes (1907). "Biologie, Morphologie und Physiologie des Begattungsvorgangs und der Eiablage von Helix pomatia". Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere. 25: 461–502, pl. 16-18.

  • Meisenheimer, Johannes (1912). Die Weinbergschnecke Helix pomatia L. Leipzig: Verlag von Dr. Werner Klinkhardt.

  • Lind, Hans (1973). "The functional significance of the spermatophore and the fate of spermatozoa in the genital tract of Helix pomatia (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora)". Journal of Zoology. 169 (1): 39–64. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1973.tb04652.x. ISSN 0952-8369.

  • Tompa, A. S. (1984). "Land Snails (Stylommatophora)". In Tompa, A. S.; Verdonk, N. H.; van den Biggelaar, J. A. M. (eds.). The Mollusca. Volume 7. Reproduction. London: Academic Press. pp. 47–140. ISBN 0-12-751407-4.

  • Hochpöchler, F.; Kothbauer, H. (1979). "Triaulie bei Heliciden (Gastropoda) Zur phylogenetischen Bedeutung des Bursa copulatrix Divertikels". Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung. 17 (4): 281–285. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0469.1979.tb00711.x.

  • Hunt, S. (1979). "The structure and composition of the love dart (gypsobelum) in Helix pomatia". Tissue and Cell. 11 (1): 51–61. doi:10.1016/0040-8166(79)90005-3.

  • Jeppesen, Leif Lau (1976). "The control of mating behaviour in Helix pomatia L. (Gastropoda: Pulmonata)". Animal Behaviour. 24 (2): 275–290. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80036-X.

  • Lodi, Monica; Koene, Joris M. (25 August 2015). "The love-darts of land snails: integrating physiology, morphology and behaviour". Journal of Molluscan Studies: eyv046. doi:10.1093/mollus/eyv046. ISSN 0260-1230.

  • Kilias, Rudolf (1985). Die Weinbergschnecke (in German). Lutherstadt Wittenberg: A. Ziemsen.

  • Duncan, C. J. (1975). "Reproduction". In Fretter, Vera; Peake, J. (eds.). Pulmonates. Volume 1. Functional anatomy and physiology. London: Academic Press. pp. 309–365. ISBN 0-12-267501-0.

  • Perrot, J.-L. (1938). "La confection du nid et la ponte chez l'Helix pomatia". Revue Suisse de Zoologie. 45: 221–235.

  • The Roman Snail, Helix pomatia Archived 24 November 2005 at the Wayback Machine

  • Bisegna, Augusto; D'Angelo, Emanuela; Gioia, Patrizia; Mussi, Margherita (2011). "Raccolta e cottura delle lumache in Abruzzo: preistoria e attualità. Collecting and cooking land snails in Abruzzo: prehistoric past and present". In Lugli, Francesca; Stoppiello, Alessandra Assunta; Biagetti, Stefano (eds.). Atti del 4° Convegno Nazionale di Etnoarcheologia, Roma, 17-19 maggio 2006 (in Italian). Oxford: Archaeopress. pp. 95–101. ISBN 978 1 4073 0797 8.

  • "The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species". Retrieved 11 May 2023.

  • Bouchet, P.; Ripken, T.; Recorbet, R. (1998). "Conservation of a narrow-range mediterranean island endemic, Helix ceratina from Corsica". Journal of Conchology. Special Publication No. 2: 205–208.

  • Welch, Joan M.; Pollard, E. (1 September 1975). "The exploitation of helix pomatia L." Biological Conservation. 8 (2): 155–160. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(75)90040-3. ISSN 0006-3207.

  • Korábek, Ondřej; Kosová, Tereza; Dolejš, Petr; Petrusek, Adam; Neubert, Eike; Juřičková, Lucie (29 November 2021). "Geographic isolation and human-assisted dispersal in land snails: a Mediterranean story of Helix borealis and its relatives (Gastropoda: Stylommatophora: Helicidae)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 193 (4): 1310–1335. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa186. ISSN 0024-4082.

  • Heller, Joseph (1984). "Landsnails from southern Lebanon". Journal of Conchology. 31: 331–336.

  • Wenz, Wilhelm (1923). Fossilium Catalogus I: Animalia. Pars 18: Gastropoda extramarina tertiaria. II. Berlin: W. Junk. pp. 706–708.

  • Korábek, Ondřej; Petrusek, Adam; Juřičková, Lucie (1 January 2018). "Glacial refugia and postglacial spread of an iconic large European land snail, Helix pomatia (Pulmonata: Helicidae)". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 123 (1): 218–234. doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blx135. ISSN 0024-4066.

  • Korábek, Ondřej; Adamcová, Tereza; Proćków, Małgorzata; Petrusek, Adam; Hausdorf, Bernhard; Juřičková, Lucie (2023). "In both directions: Expansions of European land snails to the north and south from glacial refugia". Journal of Biogeography. 50 (4): 654–668. doi:10.1111/jbi.14531. ISSN 0305-0270.

  • Rähle, Wolfgang (1983). "Die Mollusken der Grabung Helga-Abri bei Schelklingen mit einer Anmerkung zum Fund einiger mesolithischer Schmuckschnecken". Archäologisches Korrespondenzblatt. 13: 29–36.

  • Rähle, Wolfgang (1987). "Die Molluskenfaunen der Grabung Felsställe bei Mühlen, Stadt Ehingen, Alb-Donau-Kreis". Forschungen und Berichte zu Vor.- und Frühgeschichte in Baden-Württemberg. 23: 269–274.

  • Neiber, Marco T.; Hausdorf, Bernhard (2015). "Molecular phylogeny reveals the polyphyly of the snail genus Cepaea (Gastropoda: Helicidae)". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 93: 143–149. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.07.022.


  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helix_(gastropod)

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Earthworm
    Earthworm.JPG
    An unidentified earthworm species with a well-developed clitellum
    Scientific classification e
    Kingdom: Animalia
    Phylum: Annelida
    Class: Clitellata
    Order: Opisthopora
    Suborder: Lumbricina

    An earthworm is a terrestrial invertebrate that belongs to the phylum Annelida. They exhibit a tube-within-a-tube body plan; they are externally segmented with corresponding internal segmentation; and they usually have setae on all segments.[1] They occur worldwide where soil, water, and temperature allow.[2]

    Earthworms are commonly found in soil, eating a wide variety of organic matter.[3] This organic matter includes plant matter, living protozoa, rotifers, nematodes, bacteria, fungi, and other microorganisms.[4] An earthworm's digestive system runs the length of its body.[5]

    An earthworm respires (breathes) through its skin. It has a double transport system made of coelomic fluid that moves within the fluid-filled coelom and a simple, closed circulatory system.

    It has a central and peripheral nervous system. Its central nervous system consists of two ganglia above the mouth, one on either side, connected to a nerve running along its length to motor neurons and sensory cells in each segment. Large numbers of chemoreceptors concentrate near its mouth.

    Circumferential and longitudinal muscles edging each segment let the worm move. Similar sets of muscles line the gut, and their actions move digesting food toward the worm's anus.[6]

    Earthworms are hermaphrodites: each carries male and female reproductive organs. When mating, two individual earthworms will exchange sperm and fertilize each other's eggs. Each individual has both male and female genital pores. As invertebrates, they lack a true skeleton, but they maintain their structure with fluid-filled coelom chambers that function as a hydrostatic skeleton.[citation needed]

    "Earthworm" is the common name for the largest members of Oligochaeta (which is a class or subclass depending on the author). In classical systems, they were in the order Opisthopora since the male pores opened posterior to the female pores, although the internal male segments are anterior to the female. Theoretical cladistic studies have placed them in the suborder Lumbricina of the order Haplotaxida, but this may soon change.[clarification needed] Folk names for the earthworm include "dew-worm", "rainworm", "nightcrawler", and "angleworm" (from its use as fishing bait).

    Larger terrestrial earthworms are also called megadriles (translates to "big worms") as opposed to the microdriles ("small worms") in the semiaquatic families Tubificidae, Lumbricidae, and Enchytraeidae. The megadriles are characterized by a distinct clitellum (more extensive than that of microdriles) and a vascular system with true capillaries.[7]

    Anatomy

    Form and function

    Earthworm head

    Depending on the species, an adult earthworm can be from 10 mm (0.39 in) long and 1 mm (0.039 in) wide to 3 m (9.8 ft) long and over 25 mm (0.98 in) wide, but the typical Lumbricus terrestris grows to about 360 mm (14 in) long.[8] Probably the longest worm on confirmed records is Amynthas mekongianus that extends up to 3 m (10 ft) [9] in the mud along the banks of the 4,350 km (2,703 mi) Mekong River in Southeast Asia.

    From front to back, the basic shape of the earthworm is a cylindrical tube-in-a-tube, divided into a series of segments (called metameres) that compartmentalize the body. Furrows are generally[10] externally visible on the body demarking the segments; dorsal pores and nephridiopores exude a fluid that moistens and protects the worm's surface, allowing it to breathe. Except for the mouth and anal segments, each segment carries bristlelike hairs called lateral setae[11] used to anchor parts of the body during movement;[12] species may have four pairs of setae on each segment or more than eight sometimes forming a complete circle of setae per segment.[11] Special ventral setae are used to anchor mating earthworms by their penetration into the bodies of their mates.[13]

    Generally, within a species, the number of segments found is consistent across specimens, and individuals are born with the number of segments they will have throughout their lives. The first body segment (segment number 1) features both the earthworm's mouth and, overhanging the mouth, a fleshy lobe called the prostomium, which seals the entrance when the worm is at rest, but is also used to feel and chemically sense the worm's surroundings. Some species of earthworm can even use the prehensile prostomium to grab and drag items such as grasses and leaves into their burrow.

    An adult earthworm develops a belt-shaped glandular swelling, called the clitellum, which covers several segments toward the front part of the animal. This is part of the reproductive system and produces egg capsules. The posterior is most commonly cylindrical like the rest of the body, but depending on the species, it may also be quadrangular, octagonal, trapezoidal, or flattened. The last segment is called the periproct; the earthworm's anus, a short vertical slit, is found on this segment.[11]

    A segment of an earthworm posterior to the clitellum including all of the segmental structures

    The exterior of an individual segment is a thin cuticle over the skin, commonly pigmented red to brown, which has specialized cells that secrete mucus over the cuticle to keep the body moist and ease movement through the soil. Under the skin is a layer of nerve tissue, and two layers of muscles—a thin outer layer of circular muscle, and a much thicker inner layer of longitudinal muscle.[14] Interior to the muscle layer is a fluid-filled chamber called a coelom[15] that by its pressurization provides structure to the worm's boneless body. The segments are separated from each other by septa (the plural of "septum")[16] which are perforated transverse walls, allowing the coelomic fluid to pass between segments.[17] A pair of structures called nephrostomes are located at the back of each septum; a nephric tubule leads from each nephrostome through the septum and into the following segment. This tubule then leads to the main body fluid filtering organ, the nephridium or metanephridium, which removes metabolic waste from the coelomic fluid and expels it through pores called nephridiopores on the worm's sides; usually, two nephridia (sometimes more) are found in most segments.[18] At the centre of a worm is the digestive tract, which runs straight through from mouth to anus without coiling, and is flanked above and below by blood vessels (the dorsal blood vessel and the ventral blood vessel as well as a subneural blood vessel) and the ventral nerve cord, and is surrounded in each segment by a pair of pallial blood vessels that connect the dorsal to the subneural blood vessels.

    Many earthworms can eject coelomic fluid through pores in the back in response to stress; the Australian Didymogaster sylvaticus (known as the "blue squirter earthworm") can squirt fluid as high as 30 cm (12 in).[19][17]

    Nervous system

    Nervous system of the anterior end of an earthworm

    Central nervous system

    The CNS consists of a bilobed brain (cerebral ganglia, or supra-pharyngeal ganglion), sub-pharyngeal ganglia, circum-pharyngeal connectives and a ventral nerve cord.

    Earthworms' brains consist of a pair of pear-shaped cerebral ganglia. These are located in the dorsal side of the alimentary canal in the third segment, in a groove between the buccal cavity and pharynx.

    A pair of circum-pharyngeal connectives from the brain encircle the pharynx and then connect with a pair of sub-pharyngeal ganglia located below the pharynx in the fourth segment. This arrangement means the brain, sub-pharyngeal ganglia and the circum-pharyngeal connectives form a nerve ring around the pharynx.

    The ventral nerve cord (formed by nerve cells and nerve fibers) begins at the sub-pharyngeal ganglia and extends below the alimentary canal to the most posterior body segment. The ventral nerve cord has a swelling, or ganglion, in each segment, i.e. a segmental ganglion, which occurs from the fifth to the last segment of the body. There are also three giant axons, one medial giant axon (MGA) and two lateral giant axons (LGAs) on the mid-dorsal side of the ventral nerve cord. The MGA is 0.07 mm in diameter and transmits in an anterior-posterior direction at a rate of 32.2 m/s. The LGAs are slightly narrower at 0.05 mm in diameter and transmit in a posterior-anterior direction at 12.6 m/s. The two LGAs are connected at regular intervals along the body and are therefore considered one giant axon.[20][21]

    Peripheral nervous system

    • Eight to ten nerves arise from the cerebral ganglia to supply the prostomium, buccal chamber and pharynx.
    • Three pairs of nerves arise from the subpharyangeal ganglia to supply the second, third and fourth segment.
    • Three pairs of nerves extend from each segmental ganglion to supply various structures of the segment.

    The sympathetic nervous system consists of nerve plexuses in the epidermis and alimentary canal. (A plexus is a web of connected nerve cells.) The nerves that run along the body wall pass between the outer circular and inner longitudinal muscle layers of the wall. They give off branches that form the intermuscular plexus and the subepidermal plexus. These nerves connect with the cricopharyngeal connective.

    Movement

    A profile SEM image of Lumbricus terrestris setae, small bristle-like projections that facilitate movement by anchoring the earthworm in the soil.  
    An earthworm crawling over asphalt.

    On the surface, crawling speed varies both within and among individuals. Earthworms crawl faster primarily by taking longer "strides" and a greater frequency of strides. Larger Lumbricus terrestris worms crawl at a greater absolute speed than smaller worms. They achieve this by taking slightly longer strides but with slightly lower stride frequencies.[22]

    Touching an earthworm, which causes a "pressure" response as well as (often) a response to the dehydrating quality of the salt on human skin (toxic to earthworms), stimulates the subepidermal nerve plexus which connects to the intermuscular plexus and causes the longitudinal muscles to contract. This causes the writhing movements observed when a human picks up an earthworm. This behaviour is a reflex and does not require the CNS; it occurs even if the nerve cord is removed. Each segment of the earthworm has its own nerve plexus. The plexus of one segment is not connected directly to that of adjacent segments. The nerve cord is required to connect the nervous systems of the segments.[23]

    The giant axons carry the fastest signals along the nerve cord. These are emergency signals that initiate reflex escape behaviours. The larger dorsal giant axon conducts signals the fastest, from the rear to the front of the animal. If the rear of the worm is touched, a signal is rapidly sent forwards causing the longitudinal muscles in each segment to contract. This causes the worm to shorten very quickly as an attempt to escape from a predator or other potential threat. The two medial giant axons connect with each other and send signals from the front to the rear. Stimulation of these causes the earthworm to very quickly retreat (perhaps contracting into its burrow to escape a bird).

    The presence of a nervous system is essential for an animal to be able to experience nociception or pain. However, other physiological capacities are also required such as opioid sensitivity and central modulation of responses by analgesics.[24] Enkephalin and α-endorphin-like substances have been found in earthworms. Injections of naloxone (an opioid antagonist) inhibit the escape responses of earthworms. This indicates that opioid substances play a role in sensory modulation, similar to that found in many vertebrates.[25]

    Sensory reception

    Photosensitivity

    Earthworms do not have eyes (although some worms do); however, they do have specialized photosensitive cells called "light cells of Hess". These photoreceptor cells have a central intracellular cavity (phaosome) filled with microvilli. As well as the microvilli, there are several sensory cilia in the phaosome which are structurally independent of the microvilli.[26] The photoreceptors are distributed in most parts of the epidermis but are more concentrated on the back and sides of the worm. A relatively small number occurs on the ventral surface of the first segment. They are most numerous in the prostomium and reduce in density in the first three segments; they are very few in number past the third segment.[23]

    Epidermal receptor (Sense organ)

    These receptors are abundant and distributed all over the epidermis. Each receptor shows a slightly elevated cuticle which covers a group of tall, slender and columnar receptor cells. These cells bear small hairlike processes at their outer ends and their inner ends are connected with nerve fibres. The epidermal receptors are tactile in function. They are also concerned with changes in temperature and respond to chemical stimuli. Earthworms are extremely sensitive to touch and mechanical vibration.

    Buccal receptor (Sense organ)

    These receptors are located only in the epithelium of the buccal chamber. These receptors are gustatory and olfactory (related to taste and smell). They also respond to chemical stimuli. (Chemoreceptor)

    Digestive system

    The gut of the earthworm is a straight tube that extends from the worm's mouth to its anus. It is differentiated into an alimentary canal and associated glands which are embedded in the wall of the alimentary canal itself. The alimentary canal consists of a mouth, buccal cavity (generally running through the first one or two segments of the earthworm), pharynx (running generally about four segments in length), esophagus, crop, gizzard (usually), and intestine. [27]

    Food enters at the mouth. The pharynx acts as a suction pump; its muscular walls draw in food. In the pharynx, the pharyngeal glands secrete mucus. Food moves into the esophagus, where calcium (from the blood and ingested from previous meals) is pumped in to maintain proper blood calcium levels in the blood and food pH. From there the food passes into the crop and gizzard. In the gizzard, strong muscular contractions grind the food with the help of mineral particles ingested along with the food. Once through the gizzard, food continues through the intestine for digestion. The intestine secretes pepsin to digest proteins, amylase to digest polysaccharides, cellulase to digest cellulose, and lipase to digest fats.[6] Earthworms use, in addition to the digestive proteins, a class of surface active compounds called drilodefensins, which help digest plant material.[28] Instead of being coiled like a mammalian intestine, in an earthworm's intestine a large mid-dorsal, tongue-like fold is present, called typhlosole which increases surface area to increase nutrient absorption by having many folds running along its length. The intestine has its own pair of muscle layers like the body, but in reverse order—an inner circular layer within an outer longitudinal layer.[29]

    Circulatory system

    Earthworms have a dual circulatory system in which both the coelomic fluid and a closed circulatory system carry the food, waste, and respiratory gases. The closed circulatory system has five main blood vessels: the dorsal (top) vessel, which runs above the digestive tract; the ventral (bottom) vessel, which runs below the digestive tract; the subneural vessel, which runs below the ventral nerve cord; and two lateroneural vessels on either side of the nerve cord.[30]

    The dorsal vessel is mainly a collecting structure in the intestinal region. It receives a pair commissural and dorsal intestines in each segment. The ventral vessel branches off to a pair of ventro-tegumentaries and ventro-intestinals in each segment. The subneural vessel also gives out a pair of commissurals running along the posterior surface of the septum.

    The pumping action on the dorsal vessel moves the blood forward, while the other four longitudinal vessels carry the blood rearward. In segments seven through eleven, a pair of aortic arches ring the coelom and acts as hearts, pumping the blood to the ventral vessel that acts as the aorta. The blood consists of ameboid cells and haemoglobin dissolved in the plasma. The second circulatory system derives from the cells of the digestive system that line the coelom. As the digestive cells become full, they release non-living cells of fat into the fluid-filled coelom, where they float freely but can pass through the walls separating each segment, moving food to other parts and assist in wound healing.[31]

    Excretory system

    The excretory system contains a pair of nephridia in every segment, except for the first three and the last ones.[32] The three types of nephridia are: integumentary, septal, and pharyngeal. The integumentary nephridia lie attached to the inner side of the body wall in all segments except the first two. The septal nephridia are attached to both sides of the septa behind the 15th segment. The pharyngeal nephridia are attached to the fourth, fifth and sixth segments.[32] The waste in the coelom fluid from a forward segment is drawn in by the beating of cilia of the nephrostome. From there it is carried through the septum (wall) via a tube which forms a series of loops entwined by blood capillaries that also transfer waste into the tubule of the nephrostome. The excretory wastes are then finally discharged through a pore on the worm's side.[33]

    Respiration

    Earthworms have no special respiratory organs. Gases are exchanged through the moist skin and capillaries, where the oxygen is picked up by the haemoglobin dissolved in the blood plasma and carbon dioxide is released. Water, as well as salts, can also be moved through the skin by active transport.

    Life and physiology

    At birth, earthworms emerge small but fully formed, lacking only their sex structures which develop in about 60 to 90 days. They attain full size in about one year. Scientists predict that the average lifespan under field conditions is four to eight years, while most garden varieties live only one to two years.

    Reproduction

    Earthworm copulation
    Earthworm cocoons from L. terrestris
    An earthworm cocoon from L. rubellus

    Several common earthworm species are mostly parthenogenetic, meaning that growth and development of embryos happens without fertilization. Among lumbricid earthworms, parthenogenesis arose from sexual relatives many times.[34] Parthenogenesis in some Aporrectodea trapezoides lineages arose 6.4 to 1.1 million years ago from sexual ancestors.[35] A few species exhibit pseudogamous parthogenesis, meaning that mating is necessary to stimulate reproduction, even though no male genetic material passes to the offspring.[36]

    Earthworm mating occurs on the surface, most often at night. Earthworms are hermaphrodites; that is, they have both male and female sexual organs. The sexual organs are located in segments 9 to 15. Earthworms have one or two pairs of testes contained within sacs. The two or four pairs of seminal vesicles produce, store and release the sperm via the male pores. Ovaries and oviducts in segment 13 release eggs via female pores on segment 14, while sperm is expelled from segment 15. One or more pairs of spermathecae are present in segments 9 and 10 (depending on the species) which are internal sacs that receive and store sperm from the other worm during copulation. As a result, segment 15 of one worm exudes sperm into segments 9 and 10 with its storage vesicles of its mate. Some species use external spermatophores for sperm transfer.

    In Hormogaster samnitica and Hormogaster elisae transcriptome DNA libraries were sequenced and two sex pheromones, Attractin and Temptin, were detected in all tissue samples of both species.[37] Sex pheromones are probably important in earthworms because they live in an environment where chemical signaling may play a crucial role in attracting a partner and in facilitating outcrossing. Outcrossing would provide the benefit of masking the expression of deleterious recessive mutations in progeny[38] (see Complementation).

    Copulation and reproduction are separate processes in earthworms. The mating pair overlap front ends ventrally and each exchanges sperm with the other. The clitellum becomes very reddish to pinkish in colour. Sometime after copulation, long after the worms have separated, the clitellum (behind the spermathecae) secretes material which forms a ring around the worm. The worm then backs out of the ring, and as it does so, it injects its own eggs and the other worm's sperm into it. Thus each worm becomes the genetic father of some of their offspring (due to its own sperm transferred to other earthworm) and the genetic mother (offsprings from its own egg cells) of the rest. As the worm slips out of the ring, the ends of the cocoon seal to form a vaguely onion-shaped incubator (cocoon) in which the embryonic worms develop. Hence fertilization is external. The cocoon is then deposited in the soil. After three weeks, 2 to 20 offspring hatch with an average of 4. Development is direct i.e. without formation of any larva.

    Locomotion

    Close up of an earthworm in garden soil

    Earthworms travel underground by means of waves of muscular contractions which alternately shorten and lengthen the body (peristalsis). The shortened part is anchored to the surrounding soil by tiny clawlike bristles (setae) set along its segmented length. In all the body segments except the first, last and clitellum, there is a ring of S-shaped setae embedded in the epidermal pit of each segment (perichaetine). The whole burrowing process is aided by the secretion of lubricating mucus. As a result of their movement through their lubricated tunnels, worms can make gurgling noises underground when disturbed. Earthworms move through soil by expanding crevices with force; when forces are measured according to body weight, hatchlings can push 500 times their own body weight whereas large adults can push only 10 times their own body weight.[39]

    Regeneration

    Earthworms have the ability to regenerate lost segments, but this ability varies between species and depends on the extent of the damage. Stephenson (1930) devoted a chapter of his monograph to this topic, while G. E. Gates spent 20 years studying regeneration in a variety of species, but "because little interest was shown", Gates (1972) published only a few of his findings that, nevertheless, show it is theoretically possible to grow two whole worms from a bisected specimen in certain species.

    Gates's reports included:

    • Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826) with head regeneration, in an anterior direction, possible at each intersegmental level back to and including 23/24, while tails were regenerated at any levels behind 20/21; thus two worms may grow from one.[40]
    • Lumbricus terrestris (Linnaeus, 1758) replacing anterior segments from as far back as 13/14 and 16/17 but tail regeneration was never found.
    • Perionyx excavatus (Perrier, 1872) readily regenerated lost parts of the body, in an anterior direction from as far back as 17/18, and in a posterior direction as far forward as 20/21.
    • Lampito mauritii (Kinberg, 1867) with regeneration in anterior direction at all levels back to 25/26 and tail regeneration from 30/31; head regeneration was sometimes believed to be caused by internal amputation resulting from Sarcophaga sp. larval infestation.
    • Criodrilus lacuum (Hoffmeister, 1845) also has prodigious regenerative capacity with 'head' regeneration from as far back as 40/41.[41]

    An unidentified Tasmanian earthworm shown growing a replacement head has been reported.[42]

    Taxonomy and distribution

    Within the world of taxonomy, the stable 'Classical System' of Michaelsen (1900) and Stephenson (1930) was gradually eroded by the controversy over how to classify earthworms, such that Fender and McKey-Fender (1990) went so far as to say, "The family-level classification of the megascolecid earthworms is in chaos."[43] Over the years, many scientists have developed their own classification systems for earthworms, which led to confusion, and these systems have been and still continue to be revised and updated. The classification system used here which was developed by Blakemore (2000), is a modern reversion to the Classical System that is historically proven and widely accepted.[44]

    Categorization of a megadrile earthworm into one of its taxonomic families under suborders Lumbricina and Moniligastrida is based on such features as the makeup of the clitellum, the location and disposition of the sex features (pores, prostatic glands, etc.), number of gizzards, and body shape.[44] Currently, over 6,000 species of terrestrial earthworms are named, as provided in a species name database,[45] but the number of synonyms is unknown.

    The families, with their known distributions or origins:[44]

    As an invasive species

    From a total of around 7,000 species, only about 150 species are widely distributed around the world. These are the peregrine or cosmopolitan earthworms.[46] Of the 182 taxa of earthworms found in the United States and Canada, 60 (33%) are introduced species.

    Ecology

    Permanent vertical burrow

    Earthworms are classified into three main ecophysiological categories: (1) leaf litter- or compost-dwelling worms that are nonburrowing, live at the soil-litter interface and eat decomposing organic matter (epigeic) e.g. Eisenia fetida; (2) topsoil- or subsoil-dwelling worms that feed (on soil), burrow and cast within the soil, creating horizontal burrows in upper 10–30  cm of soil (endogeic); and (3) worms that construct permanent deep vertical burrows which they use to visit the surface to obtain plant material for food, such as leaves (anecic, meaning "reaching up"), e.g. Lumbricus terrestris.[47]

    Earthworm populations depend on both physical and chemical properties of the soil, such as temperature, moisture, pH, salts, aeration, and texture, as well as available food, and the ability of the species to reproduce and disperse. One of the most important environmental factors is pH, but earthworms vary in their preferences. Most favour neutral to slightly acidic soils. Lumbricus terrestris is still present in a pH of 5.4, Dendrobaena octaedra at a pH of 4.3 and some Megascolecidae are present in extremely acidic humic soils. Soil pH may also influence the numbers of worms that go into diapause. The more acidic the soil, the sooner worms go into diapause, and remain in diapause the longest time at a pH of 6.4.

    Earthworms are preyed upon by many species of birds (e.g. robins, starlings, thrushes, gulls, crows), snakes, wood turtles, mammals (e.g. bears, boars, foxes, hedgehogs, pigs, moles[48]) and invertebrates (e.g. ants,[49] flatworms, ground beetles and other beetles, snails, spiders, and slugs). Earthworms have many internal parasites, including protozoa, platyhelminthes, mites, and nematodes; they can be found in the worms' blood, seminal vesicles, coelom, or intestine, or in their cocoons (e.g. the mite Histiostoma murchiei is a parasite of earthworm cocoons[50]).

    Nitrogenous fertilizers tend to create acidic conditions, which are fatal to the worms, and dead specimens are often found on the surface following the application of substances such as DDT, lime sulphur, and lead arsenate. In Australia, changes in farming practices such as the application of superphosphates on pastures and a switch from pastoral farming to arable farming had a devastating effect on populations of the giant Gippsland earthworm, leading to their classification as a protected species. Globally, certain earthworms populations have been devastated by deviation from organic production and the spraying of synthetic fertilizers and biocides, with at least three species now listed as extinct but many more endangered.[51] This earthworm activity aerates and mixes the soil, and is conducive to mineralization of nutrients and their uptake by vegetation. Certain species of earthworm come to the surface and graze on the higher concentrations of organic matter present there, mixing it with the mineral soil. Because a high level of organic matter mixing is associated with soil fertility, an abundance of earthworms is generally considered beneficial by farmers and gardeners.[52][53] As long ago as 1881 Charles Darwin wrote: "It may be doubted whether there are many other animals which have played so important a part in the history of the world, as have these lowly organized creatures."[54]

    Devil's coach horse beetle preying on Lumbricus sp.

    Also, while, as the name suggests, the main habitat of earthworms is in soil, they are not restricted to this habitat. The brandling worm Eisenia fetida lives in decaying plant matter and manure. Arctiostrotus vancouverensis from Vancouver Island and the Olympic Peninsula is generally found in decaying conifer logs. Aporrectodea limicola, Sparganophilus spp., and several others are found in mud in streams. Some species are arboreal,[citation needed] some aquatic and some euryhaline (salt-water tolerant) and littoral (living on the sea-shore, e.g. Pontodrilus litoralis).[55] Even in the soil species, special habitats, such as soils derived from serpentine, have an earthworm fauna of their own.

    Vermicomposting of organic "wastes" and addition of this organic matter to the soil, preferably as a surface mulch, will provide several species of earthworms with their food and nutrient requirements, and will create the optimum conditions of temperature and moisture that will stimulate their activity.

    Earthworms are environmental indicators of soil health. Earthworms feed on the decaying matter in the soil and analyzing the contents of their digestive tracts gives insight into the overall condition of the soil. The earthworm gut accumulates chemicals, including heavy metals such as cadmium, mercury, zinc, and copper. The population size of the earthworm indicates the quality of the soil, as healthy soil would contain a larger number of earthworms.[56]

    Environmental impacts

    The major benefits of earthworm activities to soil fertility for agriculture can be summarized as:

    • Biological: In many soils, earthworms play a major role in the conversion of large pieces of organic matter into rich humus, thus improving soil fertility. This is achieved by the worm's actions of pulling below the surface deposited organic matter such as leaf fall or manure, either for food or to plug its burrow. Once in the burrow, the worm will shred the leaf, partially digest it and mingle it with the earth. Worm casts (see bottom right) can contain 40 percent more humus than the top 9 inches (230 mm) of soil in which the worm is living.[57]
    Faeces in the form of casts
    • Chemical: In addition to dead organic matter, the earthworm also ingests any other soil particles that are small enough—including sand grains up to 120 inch (1.3 mm)—into its gizzard, wherein those minute fragments of grit grind everything into a fine paste which is then digested in the intestine. When the worm excretes this in the form of casts, deposited on the surface or deeper in the soil, minerals and plant nutrients are changed to an accessible form for plants to use. Investigations in the United States show that fresh earthworm casts are five times richer in available nitrogen, seven times richer in available phosphates, and 11 times richer in available potassium than the surrounding upper 6 inches (150 mm) of soil. In conditions where humus is plentiful, the weight of casts produced may be greater than 4.5 kilograms (9.9 lb) per worm per year.[57]
    • Physical: The earthworm's burrowing creates a multitude of channels through the soil and is of great value in maintaining the soil structure, enabling processes of aeration and drainage.[58] Permaculture co-founder Bill Mollison points out that by sliding in their tunnels, earthworms "act as an innumerable army of pistons pumping air in and out of the soils on a 24-hour cycle (more rapidly at night)".[59] Thus, the earthworm not only creates passages for air and water to traverse the soil, but also modifies the vital organic component that makes a soil healthy (see Bioturbation). Earthworms promote the formation of nutrient-rich casts (globules of soil, stable in soil mucus) that have high soil aggregation and soil fertility and quality.[57] In podzol soils, earthworms can obliterate the characteristic banded appearance of the soil profile by mixing the organic (LFH), eluvial (E) and upper illuvial (B) horizons to create a single dark Ap horizon.[60][61]

    Earthworms accelerate nutrient cycling in the soil-plant system through fragmentation & mixing of plant debris – physical grinding & chemical digestion.[57] The earthworm's existence cannot be taken for granted. Dr. W. E. Shewell-Cooper observed "tremendous numerical differences between adjacent gardens", and worm populations are affected by a host of environmental factors, many of which can be influenced by good management practices on the part of the gardener or farmer.[62]

    Darwin estimated that arable land contains up to 53,000 per acre (130,000/ha) (of worms, but more recent research has produced figures suggesting that even poor soil may support 250,000 per acre (620,000/ha), whilst rich fertile farmland may have up to 1,750,000 per acre (4,300,000/ha), meaning that the weight of earthworms beneath a farmer's soil could be greater than that of the livestock upon its surface. Richly organic topsoil populations of earthworms are much higher – averaging 500 per square metre (46/sq ft) and up to 400 g2[dubious ] – such that, for the 7 billion of us, each person alive today has support of 7 million earthworms.[63]

    The ability to break down organic materials and excrete concentrated nutrients makes the earthworm a functional contributor in restoration projects. In response to ecosystem disturbances, some sites have utilized earthworms to prepare soil for the return of native flora. Research from the Station d'écologie Tropicale de Lamto asserts that the earthworms positively influence the rate of macroaggregate formation, an important feature for soil structure.[64] The stability of aggregates in response to water was also found to be improved when constructed by earthworms.[64]

    Though not fully quantified yet, greenhouse gas emissions of earthworms likely contribute to global warming, especially since top-dwelling earthworms increase the speed of carbon cycles and have been spread by humans into many new geographies.[65]

    Economic impact

    Earthworms being raised at La Chonita Hacienda in Mexico

    Various species of worms are used in vermiculture, the practice of feeding organic waste to earthworms to decompose food waste. These are usually Eisenia fetida (or its close relative Eisenia andrei) or the brandling worm, commonly known as the tiger worm or red wiggler. They are distinct from soil-dwelling earthworms. In the tropics, the African nightcrawler Eudrilus eugeniae[66] and the Indian blue Perionyx excavatus are used.

    Earthworms are sold all over the world; the market is sizable. According to Doug Collicutt, "In 1980, 370 million worms were exported from Canada, with a Canadian export value of $13 million and an American retail value of $54 million."[67]

    Earthworms provide an excellent source of protein for fish, fowl and pigs but were also used traditionally for human consumption. Noke is a culinary term used by the Māori of New Zealand, and refers to earthworms which are considered delicacies for their chiefs.

    See also

    References


  • Edwards, Clive A.; Lofty, J. R. (1977). Biology of Earthworms. London: Chapman & Hall. pp. preface. ISBN 0-412-14950-8.

  • Coleman, David C.; Crossley, D.A.; Hendrix, Paul F. (2004). Fundamentals of Soil Ecology. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier Academic Press. p. 170. ISBN 0-12-179726-0.

  • Bonkowski, Michael; Griffiths, Bryan S.; Ritz, Karl (November 2000). "Food preferences of earthworms for soil fungi". Pedobiologia. 44–6 (6): 667. doi:10.1078/S0031-4056(04)70080-3.

  • Lofty, Clive A.; Lofty, J. R. (1977). Biology of Earthworms. London: Chapman & Hall. p. 80. ISBN 0-412-14950-8.

  • Edwards, Clive A.; Lofty, J.R. (1977). Biology of Earthworms. London: Chapman & Hall. p. 19. ISBN 0-412-14950-8.

  • Cleveland P. Hickman Jr.; Larry S. Roberts; Frances M Hickman (1984). Integrated Principles of Zoology (7th ed.). Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing. p. 344. ISBN 978-0-8016-2173-4.

  • Omodeo, Pietro (2000). "Evolution and biogeography of megadriles (Annelida, Clitellata)". Italian Journal of Zoology. 67–2 (2): 179–201. doi:10.1080/11250000009356313. S2CID 86293273.

  • Blakemore 2012, p. xl.

  • Blakemore, R. J.; et al. (2007). "Megascolex (Promegascolex) mekongianus Cognetti, 1922 – its extent, ecology and allocation to Amynthas (Clitellata/Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae)" (PDF). Opuscula Zoologica.

  • Edwards & Bohlen 1996, p. 11.

  • Sims & Gerard 1985, pp. 3–6.

  • Edwards & Bohlen 1996, p. 3.

  • Feldkamp, J. (1924). "Feldkamp, J. "Untersuchungen über die Geschlechtsmerkmale und die Begattung der Regenwurmer Zoologische Jahrbücher". Anatomie. 46: 609–632.

  • Edwards & Bohlen 1996, p. 8-9.

  • Edwards & Bohlen 1996, p. 1.

  • Sims & Gerard 1985, p. 8.

  • Edwards & Bohlen 1996, p. 12.

  • Edwards & Bohlen 1996, p. 6.

  • Myrmecofourmis (2018). "Meet the squirting earthworm". Youtube. Archived from the original (video) on 2021-10-30.

  • "Experiment: Comparing speeds of two nerve fiber sizes". BackyardBrains. Retrieved April 4, 2015.

  • Drewes, C. D.; Landa, K. B.; McFall, J. L. (1978). "Giant nerve fibre activity in intact, freely moving earthworms". The Journal of Experimental Biology. 72: 217–227. doi:10.1242/jeb.72.1.217. PMID 624897.

  • Quillin, K.J. (1999). "Kinematic scaling of locomotion by hydrostatic animals: ontogeny of peristaltic crawling by the earthworm lumbricus terrestris". Journal of Experimental Biology. 202 (6): 661–674. doi:10.1242/jeb.202.6.661. PMID 10021320.

  • "Earthworm-nervous system". Cronodon. Retrieved April 3, 2015.

  • Elwood, R.W. (2011). "Pain and suffering in invertebrates?". ILAR Journal. 52 (2): 175–84. doi:10.1093/ilar.52.2.175. PMID 21709310.

  • Smith, J.A. (1991). "A question of pain in invertebrates". ILAR Journal. 33 (1–2): 25–31. doi:10.1093/ilar.33.1-2.25.

  • Röhlich, P.; Aros, B.; Virágh, Sz. (1970). "Fine structure of photoreceptor cells in the earthworm, Lumbricus Terrestris". Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie. 104 (3): 345–357. doi:10.1007/BF00335687. PMID 4193489. S2CID 22771585.

  • Edwards & Bohlen 1996, p. 13.

  • Liebeke, Manuel; Strittmatter, Nicole; Fearn, Sarah; Morgan, A. John; Kille, Peter; Fuchser, Jens; Wallis, David; Palchykov, Vitalii; Robertson, Jeremy (2015-08-04). "Unique metabolites protect earthworms against plant polyphenols". Nature Communications. 6: 7869. Bibcode:2015NatCo...6.7869L. doi:10.1038/ncomms8869. PMC 4532835. PMID 26241769.

  • Edwards & Bohlen 1996, pp. 13–15.

  • Sims & Gerard 1985, p. 10.

  • Cleveland P. Hickman Jr.; Larry S. Roberts; Frances M Hickman (1984). Integrated Principles of Zoology (7th ed.). Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing. pp. 344–345. ISBN 978-0-8016-2173-4.

  • Farabee, H.J. "Excretory System". Archived from the original on 30 July 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2012.

  • Cleveland P. Hickman Jr.; Larry S. Roberts; Frances M Hickman (1984). Integrated Principles of Zoology (7th ed.). Times Mirror/Mosby College Publishing. pp. 345–346. ISBN 978-0-8016-2173-4.

  • Domínguez J, Aira M, Breinholt JW, Stojanovic M, James SW, Pérez-Losada M (2015). "Underground evolution: New roots for the old tree of lumbricid earthworms". Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 83: 7–19. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.10.024. PMC 4766815. PMID 25463017.

  • Fernández R, Almodóvar A, Novo M, Simancas B, Díaz Cosín DJ (2012). "Adding complexity to the complex: new insights into the phylogeny, diversification and origin of parthenogenesis in the Aporrectodea caliginosa species complex (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae)". Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 64 (2): 368–79. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.04.011. PMID 22542691.

  • Cosín D.J.D., Novo M., Fernández R. (2011) Reproduction of Earthworms: Sexual Selection and Parthenogenesis. In: Karaca A. (eds) Biology of Earthworms. Soil Biology, vol 24. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 76ff. [1]

  • Novo M, Riesgo A, Fernández-Guerra A, Giribet G (2013). "Pheromone evolution, reproductive genes, and comparative transcriptomics in mediterranean earthworms (annelida, oligochaeta, hormogastridae)". Mol. Biol. Evol. 30 (7): 1614–29. doi:10.1093/molbev/mst074. PMID 23596327.

  • Bernstein H, Hopf FA, Michod RE (1987). "The molecular basis of the evolution of sex". Molecular Genetics of Development. Adv. Genet. Advances in Genetics. Vol. 24. pp. 323–70. doi:10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60012-7. ISBN 978-0-12-017624-3. PMID 3324702.

  • Quillan, K.J. (2000). "Ontogenetic scaling of burrowing forces in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris". Journal of Experimental Biology. 203 (Pt 18): 2757–2770. doi:10.1242/jeb.203.18.2757. PMID 10952876. Retrieved April 4, 2015.

  • Gates, G. E. (April 1949). "Regeneration in an Earthworm, Eisenia Foetida (Savigny) 1826. I. Anterior Regeneration" (PDF). The Biological Bulletin. 96 (2): 129–139. doi:10.2307/1538195. JSTOR 1538195. PMID 18120625. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-04-01.

  • Gates, G. E. (1 January 1953). "On Regenerative Capacity of Earthworms of the Family Lumbricidae". The American Midland Naturalist. 50 (2): 414–419. doi:10.2307/2422100. JSTOR 2422100.

  • "Invertebrata 20a items". Archived from the original on 2006-06-22. Retrieved 2006-11-20.

  • Fender & McKey-Fender (1990). Soil Biology Guide. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 978-0-471-04551-9.

  • Blakemore, R.J. (2006) (March 2006). "Revised Key to Worldwide Earthworm Families from Blakemore (2000) plus Reviews of Criodrilidae (including Biwadrilidae) and Octochaetidae" (PDF). A Series of Searchable Texts on Earthworm Biodiversity, Ecology and Systematics from Various Regions of the World. annelida.net. Retrieved May 15, 2012.

  • "Earthworms". Earthworms.elte.hu. Retrieved 19 March 2022.

  • [ref Blakemore (2016) Cosmopolitan Earthworms]

  • Earthworms: Renewers of Agroecosystems (SA Fall, 1990 (v3n1)) Archived 2007-07-13 at the Wayback Machine

  • Gould, Edwin; McShea, William; Grand, Theodore (1993). "Function of the Star in the Star-Nosed Mole, Condylura cristata". Journal of Mammalogy. 74 (1): 108–116. doi:10.2307/1381909. ISSN 0022-2372. JSTOR 1381909.

  • Dejean, A.; Schatx, B. (1999). "Prey Capture Behavior of Psalidomyrmex procerus (Formicidae; Ponerinae), a Specialist Predator of Earthworms (Annelida)". Sociobiology: 545–554. ISSN 0361-6525.

  • Oliver, James H. (1962). "A Mite Parasitic in the Cocoons of Earthworms". The Journal of Parasitology. 48 (1): 120–123. doi:10.2307/3275424. ISSN 0022-3395. JSTOR 3275424. PMID 14481811.

  • Blakemore, R.J. (2018) (2018). "Critical Decline of Earthworms from Organic Origins under Intensive, Humic SOM-Depleting Agriculture". Soil Systems. Soil Systems 2(2): 33. 2 (2): 33. doi:10.3390/soilsystems2020033.

  • NSW Department of Primary Industries, How earthworms can help your soil Archived 2017-08-07 at the Wayback Machine

  • Galveston County Master Gardener Association, Beneficials in the garden: #38 Earthworms

  • Darwin, Charles (1881). The Formation of Vegetable Mould through the Action of Worms, with Observations on their Habits. John Murray. Found at Project Gutenberg Etext Formation of Vegetable Mould, by Darwin

  • Blakemore, R.J. (2007). "Origin and means of dispersal of cosmopolitan Pontodrilus litoralis (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae)". European Journal of Soil Biology.

  • Fründ, Heinz-Christian; Graefe, Ulfert; Tischer, Sabine (2011), Karaca, Ayten (ed.), "Earthworms as Bioindicators of Soil Quality", Biology of Earthworms, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, vol. 24, pp. 261–278, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14636-7_16, ISBN 978-3-642-14635-0, retrieved 2021-02-18

  • Nyle C. Brady; Ray R. Weil (2009). Elements of the Nature and Properties of Soils (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-501433-2.

  • Lines-Kelly, Rebecca (2021). "How earthworms can help your soil". www.dpi.nsw.gov.au. Archived from the original on 2021-10-08. Retrieved 2021-11-30.

  • Mollison, Bill, Permaculture- A Designer's Manual, Tagari Press, 1988

  • R. T. Fisher (January 1928). "Soil Changes and Silviculture on the Harvard Forest" (PDF). Ecology. 9 (1): 6–11. doi:10.2307/1929537. JSTOR 1929537. Retrieved 2022-03-19.

  • Langmaid, K. K. (1 February 1964). "Some Effects of Earthworm Invasion in Virgin Podzols". Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 44 (1): 34–37. doi:10.4141/cjss64-005. Retrieved 19 March 2022.

  • Cooper, Shewell; Soil, Humus And Health ISBN 978-0-583-12796-7

  • Blakemore, R.J. (2017) (2017-02-12). "Nature article to commemorate Charles Darwin's birthday on 12th February". VermEcology.

  • Blanchart, Eric (1992-12-01). "Restoration by earthworms (megascolecidae) of the macroaggregate structure of a destructured savanna soil under field conditions". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 24 (12): 1587–1594. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(92)90155-Q.

  • Burke, David (December 26, 2019). "The power of earthworm poop and how it could influence climate change". CBC.

  • Blakemore, R.J. (2015). "Eco-taxonomic profile of the iconic vermicomposter - the 'African Nightcrawler', Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg, 1867)". African Invertebrates 56: 527-548. Archived from the original on 2016-10-22.

    1. Collicutt, Doug. "Biology of the Night Crawler (Lumbricus terrestris)". NatureNorth. Retrieved 5 June 2022.

    Works cited

    • Blakemore, Robert J. (2012). Cosmopolitan Earthworms – an Eco-Taxonomic Guide to the Peregrine Species of the World. (5th Ed). Yokohama, Japan: VermEcology.
    • Edwards, Clive A.; Bohlen, P. J. (1996). Biology and Ecology of Earthworms. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-412-56160-3.
    • Sims, Reginald William; Gerard, B (1985). Earthworms: Keys and Notes for the Identification and Study of the Species. London: Published for The Linnean Society of London and the Estuarine and Brackish-Water Sciences Association by E. J. Brill/Dr. W. Backhuys.

    Further reading

    • Edwards, Clive A. (ed.) Earthworm Ecology. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2004. Second revised edition. ISBN 0-8493-1819-X
    • Lee, Keneth E. Earthworms: Their Ecology and Relationships with Soils and Land Use. Academic Press. Sydney, 1985. ISBN 0-12-440860-5
    • Stewart, Amy. The Earth Moved: On the Remarkable Achievements of Earthworms. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Algonquin Books, 2004. ISBN 1-56512-337-9

    External links

    No comments:

    Post a Comment